| ▲ | 0x3f 2 hours ago |
| This assumes the same reward ratio also continues, but that's not the case. A cutting edge LLM is something much more valuable than a cracked copy of Word. Just like the LLM providers themselves decided violating copyright was an acceptable risk, it entirely depends on how people see the tradeoffs, rather than being a categorical decision. |
|
| ▲ | utilize1808 an hour ago | parent [-] |
| While that might be true, it is unlikely that open source models' capability will ever surpass frontier models --- if you have the best model (by some margin), then people will want to access it, even if it means going through compliance. |
| |
| ▲ | gizzlon 39 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > it is unlikely that open source models' capability will ever surpass frontier models Sure about that? Would you invest in products almost no-one can buy? otoh, maybe China stop releasing their best models | | |
| ▲ | utilize1808 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes, that's what I meant. It's not that the Chinese will never be able to come up with models that superior --- it's simply that they will no longer have the incentive to open-source them once their models take the lead. Training models are expensive. No one can do it for free for very long. | | |
| ▲ | gizzlon 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Maybe, or maybe they would take this opportunity to gain a lot of power and influence around the world. Just because you're not paying per token or per month does not mean they are doing it for free. |
|
|
|