Remix.run Logo
s1artibartfast 2 days ago

> If it was Ebola instead of COVID-19, 1000% guaranteed that all those antivaxxers would have been banging down the doors to get a vaccine, and would have been raging if the government hadn't rushed it out. All their antivax outrage was because they didn't think they personally were going to die from COVID, and didn't want to help save anyone else's life.

I think you are largely right, but I dont think they have any obligation to save anyone else's life.

I think there would have been better uptake amung republicans if it was presented a optional healthcare choice or suggestion.

malcolmgreaves a day ago | parent | next [-]

> I dont think they have any obligation to save anyone else's life.

That’s the problem with republicans. They reject basic tenets of a society.

You do have a responsibility to do the absolute minimum to not harm other people.

s1artibartfast 16 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, they just see it the other way. That people should accepted a chance of harm when they participate in society.

Any accommodation beyond that is them doing a favor, not an obligation.

This is why they get so reactionary when compelled.

Arodex 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>I think there would have been better uptake amung republicans if it was presented a optional healthcare choice or suggestion.

Cut to Republicans outraged reaction to Michelle Obama fitness initiatives...

Terr_ a day ago | parent | prev [-]

> I dont think they have any obligation to save anyone else's life.

I reject this framing, the person here is not a passive observer in the first place, they are a participant with obligations.

Consider a pet dog: You aren't merely responsible if it bites someone after-the-fact, you also have a proactive obligation for a reasonable level of control and monitoring, so that your erratic property doesn't harm another person in the first place. That might mean blocking off where it can go with doors and fences, a muzzle, a leash in public, certified obedience training, etc.

Your body is like that dog: Both are biological property which can erratically move to harm others without your permission. In this case, the risk is it will start spewing tiny bioweapons at other people. As the owner, you again have some obligation to exert reasonable control and supervision over your property, whether that's quarantine, vaccines, masks, home tests, etc.

____

On the heels of the "if Ebola" thought-experiment, let's try another: Imagine we somehow had forensic knowledge of how every individual SARS-COV-2 victim got sick and exactly how plus a frictionless legal system for lawsuits to recover damages from lost-work, medical bills, or deaths.

Simply by having awareness and justice, a lot of people would be singing a very different tune. If Mr. "I'm too cool for masks" infects several strangers and causes them to miss days of wages, it'll actually show up as a $5,000 bill.

s1artibartfast 16 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, they just see it the other way. That people should accepted a chance of harm when they participate in society. Any accommodation beyond that is them doing a favor, not an obligation.

This is why they get so reactionary when compelled.

I think your liability example illustrates this. They wouldn't argue that the other person knew and accepted the risks when hanging out with Mr Cool and want that to be the social expectation.