Remix.run Logo
Frieren 2 hours ago

There is no reason for any employee to not search for unionization. It is your right and it is in your best interest. Good for them.

lucumo 25 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

> There is no reason for any employee to not search for unionization.

That's a very theoretical view. (As most absolutes are.)

Unions and rules around unions can be very different depending on locality, industry and other specifics. The power and benefits a union gives a specific employee may not outweigh the cost they impose on that specific employee.

Furthermore, unions are organizations. They have their own internal power structures that can be corrupted by self-serving individuals or special interests. A blanket "union = good" view can make that invisible to you.

aaa_aaa 2 minutes ago | parent [-]

In one of my previous work, I was "forced" to enter a public union. They were simply leeches sucking government money (surprise, government was paying union premiums) through workers with almost no actual benefits. Whenever somebody glorifies Unions I just chukle.

changoplatanero 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What’s in the collective best interest may not match with what’s in the individual best interest. Perhaps unions are more likely to be in the self interest of the below average employees, the ones with no negotiating power. The best school teachers are almost certainly being held back by their unions and the worst ones are getting a free pass. When I worked at a unionized place I was blocked from an opportunity my employer offered me because it was better than what the standard negotiated terms were.

shit_game 11 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The rising tide lifts all boats.

Denying people agency and power in their negotiation by claiming they are "not as good as someone else" is antithetical to the struggle of labor - work deserves to be compensated fairly.

>When I worked at a unionized place I was blocked from an opportunity my employer offered me because it was better than what the standard negotiated terms were

Your union blocked this because your employer was trying to break your unions negotiating power by separating your interests from the collective workforce. If people who are sympathetic to management and accept that they will be compensated greater by acting against the interests of the labor union, the union should block these promotions. If you don't want to protect your coworkers by negotiating with them, then you must be interested in exploiting them by negotiating against them. Labor is a zero sum game.

dofm 7 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

You can fall ill or need working accommodations regardless of whether you are above or below average.

bArray an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The only real reason for me in the UK to join a union would be for legal representation, otherwise I can represent my own interests.

At least here in the UK our unions are heavily involved in politics - which is a massive issue. Currently, the leadership of the unions and the people in them are literally opposite sides of the political spectrum.

irl_ 44 minutes ago | parent [-]

At any moment some change outside my control could occur and my place in society would change. Right now I'm pretty self sufficient and don't really need the support of others in day to day life, but that can change, and there's nothing I can do about it. Seems like a good idea to use this opportunity to try and improve things for everyone, even if you don't care about others, just in case your place in society changes. (I actually think it's neat if we try to improve things for everyone for everyone's sake tbh but I get there are people that do not have such empathy)

mytailorisrich 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

It depends on the job and country.

In Western Europe workers are very protected so unless you are in a low end job or specific public sector job and might gain from collective wage bargaining there is often little actual benefits in being in an union, taking into account that membership isn't free.

6LLvveMx2koXfwn 24 minutes ago | parent [-]

I wonder why workers in Western Europe are so protected.

mytailorisrich 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

The fact that unions played a big role in the past does not imply that they are as important now because of the changes in legal protection, types of jobs, and society.

bko 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't believe a union would be to my best interest. Unions generally operate by encoding rules that purport to be fair and transparent. This includes things like determining how much someone gets paid based on things like tenure and education.

That sounds good in theory but as soon as you enter the workforce you'll realize that there is a huge range of capabilities thats difficult to capture but obvious to people in the weeds.

You'll also realize that strong workers want to work with other strong workers. Unions don't care where their unions fees come from so they protect all equally. This means they make it difficult to fire. Just look at police unions where they went to great lengths to "protect their own"

There are some benefits but I believe that accrue to the most mediocre or incompetent. Sure it sounds great that it's difficult to fire me and I know my salary for the next twenty years. But this is not what I'm trying to optimize for

siqncidif an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You didn't provide any argument, so you could have said the exact opposite and it would have been the same comment.

Here, I'll do it for you:

No, you are wrong it's the other way around

IncreasePosts an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It may or may not be in any individual's best interest.

For example, look at "bumping rights". If a company needs to eliminate a union position, and this is occupied by someone with say 20 years seniority, that person can "bump" some other union member out of their position who has a lower seniority. So, that person whose role was eliminated can push a person with only 5 years seniority out of their position. And then that person with 5 years seniority can bump a person with only one year seniority out of their position. And the person with 1 year seniority has no one newer than them so they get laid off.

Was it in the best interest of that newish employee to be part of a union? So they can act as a meat shield for someone much further in their career who would theoretically be much more employable in the general market?

krior an hour ago | parent [-]

The wikipedia atricle only cites american sources so that may be something unique to how US unions operate.

IncreasePosts an hour ago | parent [-]

Cousins of American style bumping is definitely in employment law in the UK(where it is done by the employer instead of the employees and union). It also exists at least in Germany(sozialauswahl) where employees theoretically who could get chopped are given points to determine who to chop, where seniority is one of the ways to gain points, as well as age, as well as having children.

sevenzero 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I work in a 2 man company, for sure a Union will have many advantages for me x)

Parae 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, a union is a way to gather forces, not only in your company, but also in broader spaces. It's easier for a union (even of two) to ask to meet your local elected officials, to seek legal support, advices from other union.

hirako2000 an hour ago | parent [-]

It also has a tendency to yield corruption. Some would call it lobbying but in the end it's a counter political force because forces on the other sides exist already.

Not sure fighting fire with fire is the solution, a last resort.

gbanfalvi an hour ago | parent [-]

It’s true. The best approach is to stand alone against the fire and try to put it out yourself. Maybe the fire will be nice to you if you beg.

irl_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm a director of my small company, and a member of UTAW. The union doesn't just help with employment disputes but also campaigns generally on improving working conditions for all, through things like health and safety and setting reasonable expectations for how work will be done.

29 minutes ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
apelapan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are you just an employee or also an owner in that company? If you are an employee only, having a union to back you up could be extremely useful if things ever go bad.

sevenzero 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Only employee. Joining an union is too expensive for me though given the reward seems pretty small. My industry does not even have a proper union (in Germany) so I'd have to join a generic one (verdi) which doesn't offer enough perks for me personally.

LtWorf an hour ago | parent [-]

Ah yes we all know unions take at least 99% of your salary…

sevenzero an hour ago | parent [-]

Did I ever claim that? Its 1% of my montly gross salary which is about 40€/month which is just too much given I have 2.500€/month to survive with.

esperent an hour ago | parent [-]

Have you evaluated how much better bargaining power that €40 would get you? You might stand to make a lot more back.

roenxi 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

He's the only employee in a 2 man company. How exactly do your think the relationship here is likely to be play out? IMO it is likely that he has a pretty good and probably rather personable relationship with the company owner. And quite likely has rather good bargaining power already given that he can double his employer's workload by walking out the door and it'd in all likelihood be a big headache to replace him.

If he can't leverage his power when he already represents 100% of the company's employees a union is unlikely to help.

mrweasel 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

That really depends on your industry and your union (and where you're based). My union doesn't negotiate my salary, I do. They do provide help with contracts, NDAs, legal advise and a bunch of other stuff and do provide salary guidance. They are also cheap at ~€475 a year.

Another larger union, which organises industrial workers, cleaning staff and generally people with less formal education, is almost twice the cost. They do negotiate at least base pay for the industries they represent. Many of the people they represent are often better off having their union do the negotiations. When handling negotiations it's obviously not only about money, but the unions do need to be able to provide at least raise in salary that can cover their dues, and sometimes they can't.

43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
iso1631 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Aside from legal support, advice, and contributing to industry influence?

Telaneo an hour ago | parent [-]

What have the Romans ever done for us?

iso1631 an hour ago | parent [-]

My union does very little for me directly. Neither does my house or car insurance. I've never needed either.

Indirectly though my union does do stuff

I'm sure Alec Baldwin was happy he was a member of a union to represent him.

pydry an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not everyone here will feel that way. Hacker news has a lot of owners, managers and what John Steinbeck called "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" (e.g. future failed startup founders).

They won't frame what they consider to be their self interest as naked self interest though, they'll dress it up as concern for the average worker or an opinion that organizing is ultimately futile because sometimes you lose.

I'm sure many of them are reaching for the downvote as they read this.

meta_gunslinger an hour ago | parent [-]

Worker here, with no aspiration of being a millionaire, a manager or an owner:

I hate unions. They always end up being led by parasites that have no idea how to do the actual job, looking to rent-seek on the backs of people who do.

pydry 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

How much do you hate for time off at weekends, paid vacations and medical leave?

simianwords an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

arrrg an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It‘s the exact opposite of selfish. It’s solidarity and efforts to denigrate solidarity and lift up stories about selfishness as the only important thing are the thing that keeps unions down.

Workers working together in solidarity is the right approach to get more power in the lopsided power dynamic between owners and workers. Owners have too much power, workers too little. Solidarity is a path towards fixing that.

simianwords 38 minutes ago | parent [-]

You think it’s solidarity with the workers because you see it is a fight between two classes. I reject that framework itself. Unions are about solidarity (if any) for the incumbents and in this case it is solidarity for the existing workers in Wikimedia.

I don’t see anything virtuous about self preservation. It doesn’t take much for a person to save their own job.

What’s virtuous is the ability to do understand the free market and uphold meritocracy ESPECIALLY when you aren’t the top dog in the hierarchy.

Unions may protect jobs but does it at the expense of other people who want your jobs who can do it better at a lower wage. Do people have the virtue to voluntarily give up their job for that person who is better than them? I don’t think so.

So please spare me the bit about solidarity!

chpatrick an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's like saying not wanting to work 14 hours a day in a coal mine is selfish because it's at the expense of global prosperity.

gbanfalvi an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

“Global prosperity” is a good one.

How is global prosperity achieved? Business owners get all the profits of our labor and maybe some of it trickles down? Workers get “prosperous” on crumbs?

I’ll be expectantly awaiting for my prosperity in the mail.

simianwords 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

You think global prosperity was won by unions fighting for rights? This is untrue and a folk theory that people hold on to, to justify their ideology.

Primarily global prosperity was achieved by higher productivity - the ability to do more with less work. Unions had very less to do for increasing productivity.

I’m not saying anything extreme because this is the academic consensus.

irl_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think this may be a US thing, in the UK at least unions work to promote solidarity.

babagan0ush an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

this comment is satire right?

throe9338e8 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Do you think trolls should have a right to unionize? We are working really hard, but conditions are not best. For start we demand salary from local goverment (I am in EU)! Nobody should be forced to work for free!