Not optimistic here. While I'm glad the SPI guys are getting paid (that is, a full time job), Apple is pretty bad at open source and developer services both, and they explicitly call out developer identity as a future direction, which doesn't fill me with hope.

▲

RobMurray 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I tried to get a personal developer account (I'm already a developer through an organisation). The app required a Driver's license as the only accepted ID. I don't drive because I'm blind. They did a screen share and talked me through applying on the web site. It failed. They never gave a reason and ignored me when I asked for one. They just said

"Hello Robert, Thank you for your patience while I awaited a response from our operations team.

Upon review, we have found that we can’t verify your identity with the Apple Developer app or provide further assistance with the Apple Account for Apple developer programs.

You can still take advantage of great content using your Apple Account in Xcode to develop and test apps on your own device. Learn more about Xcode development.

I do apologise that I was not of more help to you in this situation but wish you the best of luck for the future. "

They will destroy the developer experience when they add identity and signing.

▲

marcelox86 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I see the opposite, they have a lot of oss projects nowadays and most of their new, interesting stuff is getting open sourced too, a la Microsoft

▲

jshier 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Simply being open doesn't make them good open source projects. Luckily the SPI shouldn't need to conform to Apple's release schedule, and should operate mostly independently, so the worst aspects of Apple's open source projects will be less of an issue.

▲

y1n0 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No true Scotsman…

	▲	bigyabai 37 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Even simpler, this is a "no Scotsman" scenario. Apple has unprecedented contempt for Open designs and software standards, even compared to the pitiful example that Microsoft and Google set. Unlike them, Apple takes a stance of contravening the public good to emphasize lock-in. They refused USB-C for as long as possible to sell licensed serial connectors that their Macs didn't even use. They fought tooth-and-nail to politicize the free distribution of software when the EU wanted to enable sideloading. They abandoned open initiatives like Khronos, for no reason other than to screw over cross-platform developers. They give Safari special OS entitlements that they refuse to extend to competing mobile browsers, and then justify it as if they can't write a safe OS. There is no company on planet Earth that goes this far to undermine FOSS. Apple is the fakest Scot.

▲

SoKamil 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This acquisition sounds like a sign that Apple wants to get better on that front.

▲

jshier 2 hours ago | parent [-]

That's a pretty low bar, and doesn't necessarily mean "good".

	▲	MBCook a minute ago \| parent [-]
		That’s right. Whenever a company does something that seems good let’s just start being mean. If they’ve ever done something we don’t like we’re not allowed to celebrate anything. Might send the wrong message.