|
| ▲ | skywhopper 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| What does this have to do with robots? What does a local government failure to provide cycling infrastructure have to do with private businesses co-opting public shared resources? |
| |
| ▲ | Ferret7446 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There is cycling infrastructure, the cyclists just choose to use pedestrian sidewalks. If cyclists infringing on pedestrian pathways isn't enforced, why should robots infringing on pedestrian pathways be enforced? | | |
| ▲ | crote 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is there actual cycling infrastructure, or is it just a painted line on car infrastructure done in a way that only a suicidal person would use it? My country has great cycling infrastructure. I never see bikes on the sidewalk. There is a direct link between the two. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | kg 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Post you're replying to: "motorized vehicles"
You: "cyclists" I don't get it. Can you explain why humans on bicycles are relevant to a discussion of motorized robots? Are you talking specifically about e-bike users scooting along on the sidewalk at 40mph or something? |
| |
| ▲ | Ferret7446 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because cyclists violating pedestrian walkways isn't enforced, so robots violating pedestrian walkways not being enforced is at least the law being enforced consistently. |
|
