True but cyclists have already established a precedent of taking over pedestrian paths without consequence, at least in the CA Bay Area

▲

skywhopper 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What does this have to do with robots? What does a local government failure to provide cycling infrastructure have to do with private businesses co-opting public shared resources?

▲

Ferret7446 2 hours ago | parent [-]

There is cycling infrastructure, the cyclists just choose to use pedestrian sidewalks. If cyclists infringing on pedestrian pathways isn't enforced, why should robots infringing on pedestrian pathways be enforced?

	▲	crote 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Is there actual cycling infrastructure, or is it just a painted line on car infrastructure done in a way that only a suicidal person would use it? My country has great cycling infrastructure. I never see bikes on the sidewalk. There is a direct link between the two.

▲

kg 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Post you're replying to: "motorized vehicles" You: "cyclists"

I don't get it. Can you explain why humans on bicycles are relevant to a discussion of motorized robots? Are you talking specifically about e-bike users scooting along on the sidewalk at 40mph or something?

	▲	Ferret7446 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Because cyclists violating pedestrian walkways isn't enforced, so robots violating pedestrian walkways not being enforced is at least the law being enforced consistently.