Remix.run Logo
DeepSeek Introduces Vision(chat.deepseek.com)
133 points by RIshabh235 3 hours ago | 61 comments
rcMgD2BwE72F 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Points to https://chat.deepseek.com/sign_in for me, that's just a login screen. Anything page with some info?

RIshabh235 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not in official news yet, but works for me https://files.catbox.moe/hnnnlx.png

dude250711 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

OP made a mistake, confused HN and https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepSeek .

jiehong 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For those not trying, this allows Deepseek to understand a picture (instead of just extracting text from it), and it can describe what's in the picture, but this is not an image generation system, so you can't ask it to modify an image.

Personally, I'm a bit surprised the DS chat app still doesn't offer its own text to speech and speech to text features (I know DS doesn't have any ASR model for example, but there are quite a few in the open).

paulluuk an hour ago | parent [-]

Can you explain what the benefits are of actually "talking" with the bot instead of typing and reading?

As someone who would rather send a slack message to a coworker rather than actually walking over and talk to them, the idea of having to talk with my laptop is not appealing at all, haha.

cicko 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

If you spend your life sitting in a chair, that's fine. I tend to get all kinds of ideas, questions, and research needs while I'm walking around. Typing a paragraph or two or context takes too much time and is very risky. Especially when driving. But also just walking, cooking, cleaning, etc. Sometimes it's just not practical - winter, carrying stuff... I mostly feel privileged if I can just sit at a computer and type my question and have the time to read the answer.

QuantumNomad_ 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

When I was still using OpenAI, I used it among other things to translate from English to Spanish while talking to Spanish-speaking people in person.

I understand a bit Spanish but I don’t speak Spanish yet, and they don’t speak English.

I speak English to the AI and end with “translate to Spanish, translation only”, and then the AI says the thing I was saying in Spanish (not perfect but good enough, and also it has a slightly weird accent that might be it using English or English influenced text to speech even when speaking Spanish sentences?).

itake 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I am someone that prefers a slack message to a coworker than talking to them and I use AI.

My current flow is: Google Eloquent to capture 127WPM (my typing is best case is 65wpm). This lets me get the thoughts out without thinking too much about structure or flow, the same way I would brain-dump type it.

Next I use AI to compress, summarize, and restructure to create a clear coherent message for my peer to read (which is way faster for them).

When communicating with AI, its the same thing, except I skip the second step since AI does a good job at understanding my ramblings.

----

It drives me crazy that some cultures only send voice messages to each other. It drives me crazy they can't be respectful of my time and use STT+AI to convert their 90 second monologue to a few written sentences.

arcanemachiner 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Much faster and better flow. Don't knock it til you've tried it.

throawayonthe 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

it's very confusing. maaaybe if the stt is good and fast enough, speaking may be faster? english speakers can probably hit 150-180 wpm but seems like a hassle

stranded22 43 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Accessibility.

insumanth 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Multi-Modal is the way to go. Deepmind nailed this a long back.

bjoli 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What has been going on with deepseek recently? I have gotten lots of replies in Chinese and even more frequently, reasoning in Chinese as well.

Is it a new silent update?

k__ 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe, you could pipe it through T5 or something.

cicko 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

it's a hint that you should start learning the new Lingua Franca.

Shank 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, it is a Chinese model, maybe it thinks better in Chinese?

bogdan an hour ago | parent [-]

Hànzì can use 30%-40% fewer tokens than English. So, yes, it probably thinks better in Chinese.

Razengan an hour ago | parent [-]

If so, would other models like ChatGPT benefit from translating the user's prompt to Chinese/Japanese and thinking in Hanzi/Kanji and then converting the response back to the user's language before displaying it?

cocoflunchy an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I believe that most reasoning models actually think in their own "language" which is not really understandable by humans. The thinking traces that are shown in the UI are actually summaries generated by a smaller model in plain english (or user language). Sometimes this leaks through and you see some chinese/japanese characters in e.g. Claude's reasoning.

dryarzeg 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

As far as I'm aware, it's not true for models like DeepSeek or other Chinese open-weight models (at least those that I have seen); their reasoning traces are fully composed from some human language, be it English, Chinese or another one; by the way, most of them can adapt their reasoning based on user language, for example, if user speaks English the reasoning more likely will be in English.

I think that for DeepSeek problem (thinking and replying in Chinese) everything is kinda simpler: in their official chat, they're probably using some kind of system prompt which is (probably) written in Chinese, so that's why model may prefer Chinese in it's output.

kgeist 12 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Summaries by different smaller models are usually made by closed proprietary models like Claude as a way to combat the distillation of real reasoning traces by competitors. Open weight models show the real reasoning traces. Reasoning traces operate in the same space as the non-reasoning output. It's all just one large text for an LLM. Reasoning is simply chat completion between <think></think> tags. LLMs are autoregressive and can't backtrack normally once a token has been produced, so reasoning simply allows preparing the text in such a way that fewer backtracks are needed, and fewer errors in general (i.e. all the necessary context to solve a problem has full focus in the attention blocks, or something like that)

seydor 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

> summaries generated

Or hallucinated

bogdan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are other even more efficient ways of doing this, i.e. using images instead of raw text https://xcancel.com/karpathy/status/1980397031542989305?lang...

grogg an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, it’s why the Caveman skill includes a Wenyan mode.

https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman

serf 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This happens to me a lot when I ask a qwen3.6 model to respond to a question in JSON. No clue why.

surgical_fire 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I use DeepSeek daily, never happened to me.

I use the API however, not the chat interface.

abyssin 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It doesn’t seem that recent to me, at least been like that for six months.

RIshabh235 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

yes, kind of silent update plus they might have better chinese datasets and user data for their training, that might be leading to chinese preference.

alfiedotwtf 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Are you running out of context? I’ve found that tooling and giberish most of the time happens when I’m butting up against the high watermark of my context window. One other thing it could be, I’ve read that lower quanta like Q1 and Q2 for smaller models can leak Chinese

epolanski 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It never happened to me with Deepseek, but it happened multiple times with Kimi 2.6.

It also happened a handful of times with Anthropic models.

throwaw12 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wish they published a post where we read about capabilities, quality, accuracy and other parameters

tornikeo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I really need this as an API.

Turns out, to use Claude Agents SDK, you need to have a vision enabled API. If Deepseek API could see, it can fully drive Claude Code and Claude Agents SDK. A project I'm working on relies on a Claude-in-CloudflareWorker setup and I've been relying on Qwen and gemini flash lite, both more expensive than Deepseek.

Can't wait to have it available on deepseek.

5701652400 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

same here. I am using Gemini 2.5 Flash as VSCode "vision proivder" for Deepseek V4 Pro, but it is expensive and not accurate. can't wait for native Deepseek vision.

petesergeant 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Have you looked at MiniMax or MiMo? Available today via OpenRouter, and it’ll make the path to porting to DeepSeek a line change https://openrouter.ai/collections/vision-models

arjie 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If they'd do one of those little extraneous additions like Qwen does, so that I can have DS4 Flash with Vision that would be great. I've got to run a separate model entirely so that I can get vision and I'd prefer to just put it all in one space.

RIshabh235 an hour ago | parent [-]

Maybe they will do now as they got huge funding.

earth2mars 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And it's really good and fast. Have tested with bunch of odd photos on what is happening. Overall the training set seems large enough to know what's what and where

RIshabh235 3 hours ago | parent [-]

yes and I hope their rate of shipping increases after recent funding.

alexwwang an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Does the api support vision yet?

RIshabh235 42 minutes ago | parent [-]

No announcements about it yet.

alexwwang 40 minutes ago | parent [-]

That makes sense. I haven’t found it work in api yet.

crvdgc 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Vision has been in A/B testing for a while now (at least in China). Is there an official announcement that this will be available for everyone?

RIshabh235 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I haven't seen any official announcement yet, works for me though.

innis226 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nice, is this available in the API now as well?

naseemali925 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am also waiting on the vision support in API. Its the only thing blocking me from buying their subscription.

dakolli 2 hours ago | parent [-]

What subscription?

naseemali925 an hour ago | parent [-]

I mean't topup. They don't have subsciptions.

RIshabh235 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not in the api yet.

tw1984 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

what is more interesting to me is why it takes so long for them to support vision.

does it implies that Liang believes vision/voice is less important on its way to AGI?

RIshabh235 31 minutes ago | parent [-]

Might be compute bottleneck due to the US chips act and migrating to Huawei ecosystem.

thiago_fm 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just wait until they release their coding model. Once they do an Opus-level coding model, the sandcastle of the AI economy in the US will fall

el_io 7 minutes ago | parent [-]

They had deepseek-coder.

andrewstuart 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

OpenAI and Anthropic need to get this free foreign competition banned.

0xpgm 38 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Is that before or after the OpenAI and Anthropic pay off all the people and companies who's copyrights were violated when they used their works for free to train their models?

At least DeepSeek freely gives back the benefits.

epolanski 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Care to expand on why? Or did you forgot the /s at the end?

dudisubekti 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I feel like '/s' has ruined irony on the internet. Irony is at its best if left ambiguous, lol.

cromka 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Nah, they're serious actually!

Weryj 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Wait, did that need a /s?

ReptileMan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If everything goes to plan everyone involved with big US models will be trillionaire and everyone else will poor and unemployed. If there are open and cheap to run Chinese models (and please god silicon) the financial house of cards that we have build will fall, people involved with big US models will be poor and unemployed, and everyone else will be slightly less poor and unemployed than in the first scenario.

What is good for Dario is good for America.

andrewstuart 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Why do you think it’s free?

Any ideas, theories where they get their payoff?

cromka 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, subscription options they sell on deepseek.com