| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
They’re expressing a broad slice of gripes to a powerful person. The point isn’t to get a win. It’s to embarrass them. Make them uncomfortable. So that they then ask how to prevent that in the future. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | asdfasgasdgasdg 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don’t think there is any action Pichai can take on this that wouldn’t hurt vastly more than a few students walking out of his commencement speech. He is a man well used to people complaining about his policies. Googlers do so all the time internally, including on this same topic, and have been for years. If gestures like this were going to move him, he’d have been moved already. That being said, I don’t have a problem with people standing up for what they believe, even when it has no practical impact. It’s good character building. I would expect that Sundar is similarly unbothered. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | EA-3167 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If you're still trying to shame the shameless in 2026 then you missed the past decade IMO. The likes of Pichai can afford to ignore the 10% that walked out, frankly they can afford to ignore far more than that and have to great success. The idea that symbolic actions by a small number of students represents something other than entertainment for those students and hope-porn for their elders doesn't stand up to scrutiny. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||