If you're still trying to shame the shameless in 2026 then you missed the past decade IMO. The likes of Pichai can afford to ignore the 10% that walked out, frankly they can afford to ignore far more than that and have to great success. The idea that symbolic actions by a small number of students represents something other than entertainment for those students and hope-porn for their elders doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

▲

JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> likes of Pichai can afford to ignore the 10% that walked out

Of course he can. But he’s still choosing to speak at a commencement. Why?

▲

asdfasgasdgasdg 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

For the other 90%? For his own personal reasons? It’s almost impossible to guess.

	▲	JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> For the other 90%? If it’s this, the protest had no effect on him. > For his own personal reasons? I’m guessing this plays a bigger part than comments here give credit for. Pichai isn’t pitching anyone on anything of consequence to him at this commencement. He is, broadly speaking, flattering his ego.

▲

EA-3167 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you stand in front of a room full of people, about to give a speech, you already know that you aren't going to reach 100% of the people present. Moving the floor to 90% hardly matters at all, and the fact that the minority wasn't able to mobilize the majority would be my takeaway.

Beyond that why do any of these guys give speeches? They do it to raise their profile, to polish their ego, to promote recruitment or their ideals, and of course because they genuinely believe they have something to offer.