| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago |
| > It's a trend that is growing all over Europe The current system permitting freedom of movement across the continent while devolving immigration policy entirely to members creates a fundamental tension the EU needs to resolve. Because otherwise, Berlin can basically dictate EU immigration single handedly, which is bound to generate backlash even if they run a perfect programme. |
|
| ▲ | geremiiah 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| To me it seems like EU countries are independently embarking on the Canada-policy of importing a whole bunch of South East Asians and Latin Americans. From Hungary to Ireland, you see the same trend. Part of it is by economic necessity. For example finding nursing staff is very challenging and you have to compete with the US and Australia and other rich countries. But part of it doesn't make much sense. We really don't need to import any kind of engineers from outside of Europe when we have about 2,500 EU universities pumping out graduates each year. |
| |
| ▲ | vladms 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > We really don't need to import any kind of engineers from outside I was involved in a startup in the Netherlands. We tried to recruit Dutch people, all wanted safe 9-5 jobs where they would know what they would do in 1-2 years. A startup can not guarantee that. We ended up with most engineers foreigners, many (but not all) that have studied there. So I would say that it is also risk and opportunity related. Someone "from outside" will be willing to do more, will have to prove himself, will take more risk. A "local" will have family support, wealth, a network, might want and value stability. I don't have an opinion about how things "should be", I am just sharing how I saw them (myself an immigrant, multiple times) | | |
| ▲ | true_religion 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I guess the question for society is: do we want businesses who cannot pay domestic workers a fair wage to exist in our country? Or do we want them to exist elsewhere and we import those products? To society a startup with a 99%% chance of failing to IPO is no different from a sweatshop which also wants skilled but cheap labor. | |
| ▲ | jnwatson 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The solution is obviously the American one. Make everyone so afraid of their job prospects that working for a startup isn't materially different in terms of job security. |
| |
| ▲ | andrewmutz 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | When a person relocates to a country where their labor is more productive, a large amount of new economic value is created. Much of that value is captured by the migrant through higher earnings, but a lot also accrues to the people in the community they join. So an engineer joining a country that already has engineers still creates a ton of value in the destination country | | |
| ▲ | Avicebron 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | And if they displace someone trying to join the engineering workforce say right out of school? What about housing? | | |
| ▲ | andrewmutz 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There is no fixed demand for jobs, nor fixed supply of housing. Immigrant consumption creates a lot of jobs and immigrant labor creates a lot of housing | |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | tadfisher 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Look up the "lump of labour fallacy". The jobs market is not a zero-sum thing. | | |
| ▲ | Avicebron 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The timescale that the "lump of labour fallacy" operates on, as in the aggregate effects on employement, doesn't necessarily work for most people (individually). Therefore it isn't really a good metric at the scale required to alleviate the problems people are facing. "Eventually it will work out." Isn't proffering a solution. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | bluescrn 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > For example finding nursing staff is very challenging No. Finding staff that'll work for very low wages is very challenging. It's not really about bringing in essential skills, it's about driving down wages. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It's not really about bringing in essential skills, it's about driving down wages Sort of. You’re simply not going to have an agricultural sector with at Canadian and American wages without significantly higher food prices and protectionism. One day we may automate that. But that will still be more expensive for the foreseeable future. Voters seem to be picking domestic production and low prices, with low wages being a side effect. (Business interests of course love those.) | |
| ▲ | Muromec 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Free borders policy is a special case of free market, so of course more competition is intended to drive the cattle prices down . | |
| ▲ | michaelmrose 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is literally what anyone means when they can't or can't easily find anyone for anything which isn't evil or suicidal. |
| |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | tonfa 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > The current system permitting freedom of movement across the continent while devolving immigration policy entirely to members creates a fundamental tension the EU needs to resolve. Because otherwise, Berlin can basically dictate EU immigration single handedly, which is bound to generate backlash even if they run a perfect programme. You do realize German nationals (followed by French) are the top contingent in term of immigration to Swizerland. (Only EU citizens benefit from freedom of movement to settle in Switzerland) |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > You do realize German nationals (followed by French) are the top contingent in term of immigration to Swizerland Yes. I’m also conceding to the SVP the observation that a good fraction of said nationals are recently naturalized. | | |
| ▲ | tonfa 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | If the SVP says it, it must be true :) What's their sources? I'm sure they could find a couple of anecdotes, doesn't make it significant. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | stephbook 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this Berlin that decides anything and rolls it out contintent-wide with us in the room right now? |
| |
| ▲ | includenotfound 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Spain is legalizing 500k immigrants: https://www.nbcnews.com/world/spain/spain-legalizing-half-mi... Not quite Berlin, but same effect: nearly indiscriminate influx of poorly vetted immigrants that can soon travel all around Europe. So yes, it's with us in the room, just not right now, but very soon. | |
| ▲ | whstl 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I believe the point was more that Germany can accept lots of immigrants being a large country, and freedom of movement will allow them inside all countries, which can lead to backlash. | | |
| ▲ | tpm 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | And that point is wrong. An immigrant with a legal residence in Germany but no permanent residence permit can't just pack up and go live elsewhere. | | |
| ▲ | whstl 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yep, someone points it to GP down below. One needs to apply for immigration again in the next country if they want to travel for more than a vacation. |
|
| |
| ▲ | inigyou 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Berlin is basically forcing the EU's hand regarding the Gaza war, so, yes? | | |
| ▲ | SiempreViernes 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Only in the same sense that Hungary was dictating Russia and Ukraine policy. | |
| ▲ | stephbook 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How is that related to immigration? > Berlin can basically dictate EU immigration single handedly That's what I was responding to. Note the UK left the EU and accepted more immigrants than before. We didn't force them. Hungary and Poland never accepted Syrian immigrants either and they weren't forced to accept them iirc. | | |
| ▲ | inigyou 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | FabCH 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Varoufakis is Greek and so EU citizen. He literally cannot be banned from Schengen. He is banned from public speaking in Germany and only Germany. Which the Germans can do to anyone on their own territory, including German citizens. |
|
| |
| ▲ | lovich 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Was wondering how long this thread could go before someone made it about the omnicause. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ProllyInfamous 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think this somewhat federation causes problems similar (by design!) to those that the Federal System within the United States encourages. The "finger pointing" allows for status quo to carry on as usual, while the overlapping & glacial judicial systems legislate glacially from their antiquated benches... ---- Hopefully we can all take inspiration from the living memories of balkanization – smaller groups, hopefully with shared interests and common backgrounds, ought to be in charge of themselves; and themselves, only. |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > we can all take inspiration from the living memories of balkanization Massive internal trade barriers and security so fragmented you’re at the whim of your larger neighbors? | | |
| ▲ | ProllyInfamous 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's a give/take. Even Israel & Spain have fenced borders (the latter on African continent)[i.e. it's not just USA "being racist"]. Every jurisdiction needs to limit immigration more (which EU's dispersed jurisdictions make impossible, by statute) before any one country can tackle any of their other lacks/disputes. The current EU setup is the inverse of USA's, where the feds technically regulate most immigration issues (instead of EU's individual memberstates having most power), but not all. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Even Israel & Spain have fenced borders Balkanisation refers to fences within one’s borders. It’s fragmentation that leads to less wealth, less security and eventually a loss of sovereignty to a powerful neighbor who notices. | | |
| ▲ | ProllyInfamous 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I understand and encourage the "breaking up" aspect. Smaller, more home-rule societies. Looking at it from the Slovene POV (which ultimately benefited from the dissolution of Yogoslavia, occurring within my/most lifetime), local industries/GDP benefitted greatly. | | |
| ▲ | vladms 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Slovenia joined EU rather fast (2003), so that might also have contributed to the prosperity. Joining EU is not exactly "breaking up", is more like "joining". Currently, the rest of ex-Yugoslavia countries don't seem to do as well as Slovenia, and the main difference is date of joining the EU... | | |
| ▲ | ProllyInfamous an hour ago | parent [-] | | Slovenia has been doing way better than the rest of Yogoslavia for longer than it's been a country... it's one of the reasons they lead initial Days War. IIRC their GDP (regionally) was 6x the Yogoslavian average in 1990~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | FabCH 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Immigration is not devolved. The whole point of Schengen is the opposite of devolution of immigration. You are confusing immigration with naturalization. Only if Berlin starts handing out German passports do they dictate EU immigration single-handedly. |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Only if Berlin starts handing out German passports do they dictate EU immigration single-handedly Fair enough and great point. It’s incredibly hard to naturalize in Switzerland. Less so in Germany. (Though still much harder than in America, at least based on my American friends who naturalized there and this Swiss of Indian and Germanic origin who naturalized in America.) It’s fair for those countries to want to maintain those differences. | | |
| ▲ | aranelsurion 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > It’s incredibly hard to naturalize in Switzerland. Less so in Germany Is it? Asking out of curiosity, from a cursory look both countries require self-sufficiency, language (in fact Switzerland looks a little easier on this), no criminal background, an integration test to be taken (and both seem easy) and time in the country. Only major difference seems to me is Germany takes 5 years in paper (more like 6-7 in reality with bureaucracy) and Switzerland takes 10 years in paper. | | |
| ▲ | kuerbel 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In Switzerland they are voting on naturalisation... which means you are at the whim of people living in the same place. If you don't fit in you'll have a hard time, if they don't like you for whatever reason etc, wrong hair colour, you name it. In Germany it's an administrative act with clear demands. | | |
| ▲ | FabCH 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Citizens voting on naturalization was abolished by federal court decision since 2008. You can still be voted on by the city council though, but they are required to provide a reason and „wrong hair color“ will not pass legal challenge. | | |
| ▲ | kuerbel 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | We are both correct in a way.
Local authorities can still decide applications. It's no longer a secret ballot but naturalisation commissions, local councils, municipal parliaments, or assemblies. Some decisions still make headlines though because the reasons are rather weird sometimes. |
|
| |
| ▲ | snowpid 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Switzerland want less than B1? I find B1 barely can have a normal conversation. | | |
| ▲ | aranelsurion 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | B1 speaking, A2 writing if my token predictor is correct. :) -- which is a little less than Germany (B1 both) |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | viking123 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Some countries print them out very liberally though. Sweden did not require financial self-sufficiency or language ability until like 2 weeks ago. I raised this point back in like 2015 and was promptly called a racist. So these have been handed to people who have nothing to do with the country. Few other countries have done this too but less so. Now all their children etc. will have unfettered access to Switzerland. Tbh I cannot see anything else but Swiss people at some point voting themselves out of this somehow. | | |
| ▲ | greyhound 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Your comments do land on the xenophobic side though.
E.g."Indians with German passports": You need to pass a naturalization and language tests before applying for citizenship. Until recently you couldn't even apply without living in the country for 6+ years - now reduced to 4+. So how do you or potential Swiss know they are Indians? The first thing that comes to mind is that you're assuming it by the way they look. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | vrganj 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | viking123 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
| ▲ | greyhound 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | German passport == German. | | | |
| ▲ | mrkeen 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | While they're at it, they should kick out the French, the Germans, the Italians, and any other immigrants refusing to speak Swiss. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > refusing to speak Swiss I know this is tongue in cheek. But one of the hallmarks of a nation of immigrants is the enforced tolerance of speaking multiple national languages. Lots of people who only speak on throws off that balance. | |
| ▲ | rdtsc 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > While they're at it, they should kick out the French, the Germans, the Italians, and any other immigrants refusing to speak Swiss. What's this Swiss language you speak of? I never heard of it. You must mean Romansh but that's only 0.5% of the population or so. You'd have to kick out 95.5% of the Swiss population too then? | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s their point. Switzerland is a nation of immigrants. We don’t tend to be portrayed as such outside. And the SVP tends to forget this. (As does the GOP.) | | |
| ▲ | lovich 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Are you Swiss? I thought you were American from previous interactions. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Western Europe will be a massive powder keg in 20 years Western Europe has been a powder keg for at least three millennia. The only thing keeping a cap on it recently was American hegemony. (EDIT: to be clear, American hegemony is waning. The powder keg is uncapped, and we’re one of the parties throwing in matches.) | | |
| ▲ | inigyou 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | America is who's propping up all the far right parties now. America wants a destable, fractured Europe. Russia too, but America has more funds. | | |
| |
| ▲ | epolanski 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | So what? I despise such openly xenophobic posts. And Indian immigration tends to be the most educated and wealthy. It's also the wealthiest ethnic group in the US. By far. In any case, leaving Schengen for Switzerland would be de facto equivalent to Brexit, an economic disaster. Switzerland thrives by attracting highly qualified professionals for it's service and manufacturing industries and yes, also at the lower end where Swiss nationals aren't lining up to be plumbers, couriers or cleaning staff. | | |
| ▲ | abc03 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The plumbers I had were all Swiss. There is not an overproportional amount of foreigners working in this profession. | |
| ▲ | viking123 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Maybe they prefer living amongst themselves than make number go to the moon. If these guys are such GDP rocket fuel and a solution, they can make their own country the best in the world. I visited few times and I like the country but I don't expect them to accept or cater to me. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Who's they? > If these guys are such GDP rocket fuel and a solution, they can make their own country the best in the world. Not every country in the world gives the same opportunities, it's only natural many motivated individuals may try their chances elsewhere, I see nothing wrong with it. I'm an European and I have many grandparents and their relatives who emigrated to Argentina, US, Canada a century or so ago. My parents left communist Poland for Italy in the 70s. Many of my friends left Italy and now reside in the UK, Netherlands, Switzerland, Australia and some in the US too. Overly xenophobic anti immigration stances don't resonate with me at all. Immigration is a net benefit for humanity, it has had a huge impact on distributing human capital where it could best express it's talents. Like everything it has its cons and regulations are needed. But none of those should be rooted on open racism. | | |
| ▲ | geremiiah 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | IDK about Argentina, but the US, Australia and Canada went through the whole cycle post WWII. At first they opened up their borders because they were in need of workers. However, at some point, due to various factors, including rising anti-immigration sentiments, they retightened their immigration policies again. This all happened pre-1990s. And all of those are immigration countries, unlike countries in Europe. | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Mate, none of those governments were led by natives but immigrants and their descendants. Unless you live under a rock it's not Crazy Horse or Geronimo sitting in the white house, but a descendant of immigrants. | | |
| ▲ | Thraway198 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Crazy Horse and Geronimo's ancestors also came from elsewhere. No one just springs up from the ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
|