Well, in the brief window that I got to test Fable 5, my brief review is: somehow an (already specced!) minor feature in my 150k loc codebase ended up costing.. $153! For like, an hour or two worth of work and maybe 8 or 9 requests overall. I'd say it was not remotely worth it.

▲

zzleeper 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I asked it to tweak the fonts/colors of a very very simple static page and it blew through $35 (which is a lot for me lol; it's 10 days of my monthly codex plan).

▲

rblatz 3 hours ago | parent [-]

You shouldn’t be using Fable for that, that’s Haiku work.

▲

supuun 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I think they were hoping for more advanced model’s more advanced “taste”

	▲	shdh 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This is common sentiment amongst many users

▲

upbeat_general 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If I used a racecar to go 25mph in a residential neighborhood, I’d make a similar conclusion.

▲

overgard 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It was made available in my subscription so I tested it out. I'm glad I tested it in a subscription, since I'd be pretty irritated if I had spent that amount of money accidentally in API usage. I guess what I've learned is what I already know, which is that the newer models seem to increase costs a lot with no perceptible benefit to my workflow.

▲

Schiendelman 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Wait, so it didn't cost you $153? Are you just extrapolating based on what it would have cost in API usage?

▲

overgard 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I said "cost", not "cost me". I use `ccusage` to track what my unsubsidized token spend would be since I'm sure these subscriptions won't stick around forever and I want to have a realistic idea of what these things actually cost in a professional setting.

To be fair though, even if it's not costing me that much it's evidently costing Anthropic a pretty penny, I'm up to like $800 in spend on my $200 subscription in less than a week.

▲

Schiendelman an hour ago | parent [-]

What makes you think the API based cost is the cost to Anthropic?

	▲	overgard 32 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Well, they're selling a non-essential commodity in a highly competitive industry with about zero lock in or customer loyalty, using the standard VC playbook of "capture the market then worry about costs". I don't see space for large margins in there, and if there are margins they're probably recent because of the IPO.

▲

dansquizsoft 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Hard agree