| ▲ | upbeat_general 3 hours ago |
| If I used a racecar to go 25mph in a residential neighborhood, I’d make a similar conclusion. |
|
| ▲ | overgard 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It was made available in my subscription so I tested it out. I'm glad I tested it in a subscription, since I'd be pretty irritated if I had spent that amount of money accidentally in API usage. I guess what I've learned is what I already know, which is that the newer models seem to increase costs a lot with no perceptible benefit to my workflow. |
| |
| ▲ | Schiendelman 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wait, so it didn't cost you $153? Are you just extrapolating based on what it would have cost in API usage? | | |
| ▲ | overgard 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I said "cost", not "cost me". I use `ccusage` to track what my unsubsidized token spend would be since I'm sure these subscriptions won't stick around forever and I want to have a realistic idea of what these things actually cost in a professional setting. To be fair though, even if it's not costing me that much it's evidently costing Anthropic a pretty penny, I'm up to like $800 in spend on my $200 subscription in less than a week. | | |
| ▲ | Schiendelman an hour ago | parent [-] | | What makes you think the API based cost is the cost to Anthropic? | | |
| ▲ | overgard 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Well, they're selling a non-essential commodity in a highly competitive industry with about zero lock in or customer loyalty, using the standard VC playbook of "capture the market then worry about costs". I don't see space for large margins in there, and if there are margins they're probably recent because of the IPO. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | dansquizsoft 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Hard agree |