| ▲ | tsunamifury 2 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hey dpark. I quite literally created and productized predictive linguistics and behavioral vectors at Google. If you had stopped to consider what I explained; you’d understand that it’s the process of turning random garbage into increasingly acceptable outputs. Ie training the monkeys. The insight you are missing is the rule of networked scale. It turns out that any reactive node scaled enough can form sophisticated predictive system given reward over a training topography, even if it starts out at garbage or is literally made of monkeys. So it is garbage. And you can turn garbage into semi-intelligence. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dpark 2 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
A human child is born with no ability to speak intelligibly. All they can do is babble. Through years of training they gain the ability to speak intelligibly and communicate in advanced ways. The act of successful training means it’s not garbage anymore. > So it is garbage. This statement is ultimately meaningless and I continue to find it weird that someone who works in this space would support this view. If you fundamentally change the nature of a thing, it’s no longer that original thing. Is tan HDD still random garbage after you fill it with family photos just because that’s how it starts? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||