| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > if it passes, there will be something tied to the bilateral referendum in 2027/28 to try to supersede it This is my thinking, too. If it really comes down to Chexit-or-nothing, we’ll have another referendum. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That was the UK's thinking, too. "We won't have a hard Brexit! Of course they'll negotiate a plan!" | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | And then the UK delivered an Article 50 notice. That isn’t something this referendum would force. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The UK's referendum was also non-binding, in theory. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > UK's referendum was also non-binding, in theory If SVP gets control of government they’ll probably try to Chexit irrespective of any referendum power. That’s orthogonal to this question. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | tonfa 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well there's anyway going to be a referendum about the bilateral. (which is why I find the initiative somewhat stupid, you can vote on the real deal in a few years, about whether people want or do not want to have agreements with the EU, instead of hiding it behind a fake/emotional reason) |
|
|