| ▲ | tonfa 3 hours ago |
| Especially after we saw how happy the EU was to negotiate (they didn't budge) when https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Swiss_immigration_initiat... passed. The new initiative is basically the same, but with no leeway to ignore it. (that said I suspect if it passes, there will be something tied to the bilateral referendum in 2027/28 to try to supersede it) |
|
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago | parent [-] |
| > if it passes, there will be something tied to the bilateral referendum in 2027/28 to try to supersede it This is my thinking, too. If it really comes down to Chexit-or-nothing, we’ll have another referendum. |
| |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That was the UK's thinking, too. "We won't have a hard Brexit! Of course they'll negotiate a plan!" | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And then the UK delivered an Article 50 notice. That isn’t something this referendum would force. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The UK's referendum was also non-binding, in theory. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > UK's referendum was also non-binding, in theory If SVP gets control of government they’ll probably try to Chexit irrespective of any referendum power. That’s orthogonal to this question. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | tonfa 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well there's anyway going to be a referendum about the bilateral. (which is why I find the initiative somewhat stupid, you can vote on the real deal in a few years, about whether people want or do not want to have agreements with the EU, instead of hiding it behind a fake/emotional reason) |
|