| ▲ | microtonal 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if Apple went somewhere like wearable glasses with it, it'd be a hit It would be a PR disaster, most people outside the SV bubble just find smart glasses what they really are: creepy. Even more so because Meta is going to roll out face recognition and going to live-annotate people you encounter in the streets. Luckily that shit is not allowed in the EU. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nozzlegear 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A few things: - A lot of people found smart watches to be nerdy, something that only geeks would wear, until Apple made the Apple Watch. Along the same lines, everyone (on tech-oriented social media) thought the AirPods looked stupid and dorky when they were first announced, but now they're ubiquitous. - People find smart glasses from Meta (and previously, Google) creepy, but – and it's anathema to say this around certain parts of HN – like it or not, people do generally trust Apple with their data in a way that they don't with those other companies. - It seems like you're assuming Apple's glasses would include outward-facing cameras in the first place. Do we know that? The ideal device for me would just include the downward-facing IR cameras for gesture detection. Presumably only people under NDA can say for sure right now. > Luckily that shit is not allowed in the EU. What's not allowed? Facial recognition, street annotation, AI? Does it make a difference if it's local, on-device AI? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||