|
| ▲ | projektfu an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Someone apparently thought that about a Texas option contract but the Texas Supreme Court disagreed and said the contract was still valid, endorsing the fiction. |
|
| ▲ | repelsteeltje an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Would that mean the original owner gets it back? Would they have to pay property tax backlog retroactively? Might be huge.. |
| |
| ▲ | dylan604 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'd put any tax bill owed back to the city. They are the ones that cheated on the deal. Of course, I live in fantasy land with that kind of notion |
|