Nothing that you are saying here has any commitment to what to expect, is all heresay. It's 100% ad hominem, to the person. That's a fault whether the direction is complimentary or derogatory. I personally really don't want to see vacuous empty comments like this.

▲

fowl338 30 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I personally really don't care that you dislike podcasts, or don't have the time to click the link and spend five seconds reading the summary, or are lashing out because you had a bad day—can you do that somewhere else?

▲

khimaros 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

were you trying to reply to someone else?

▲

jauntywundrkind 4 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I'm saying they are hyping up some random podcast while saying sweet nothings. I really don't like empty hype. I want some actual content to posts that actually says something, not just links breathlessly encouraging me to go spend an hour listening.

▲

adampunk 4 hours ago | parent [-]

And where did the ad hominem part arise?

▲

ivewonyoung 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://human.libretexts.org/Under_Construction/Clean_Up_(Pr...

Search for "positive ad hominem".

▲

jauntywundrkind 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's all empty words.

> a very thorough and nuanced discussion

> bunch of smart investment / finance guys

> No click-bait-sky-is-falling content.

The middle one is the ad-hominem puffery. The rest isn't quite exactly 100% 'of the person's, but still doesn't give me any actual leads into what the content is: its just empty puffery.

	▲	possibleworlds an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> vacuous empty comments > saying sweet nothings > empty puffery By definition the only ad-hominem comments to be seen anywhere above.
	▲	dgellow 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[flagged]