were you trying to reply to someone else?

jauntywundrkind 4 hours ago | parent [-]

No, I'm saying they are hyping up some random podcast while saying sweet nothings. I really don't like empty hype. I want some actual content to posts that actually says something, not just links breathlessly encouraging me to go spend an hour listening.

▲

adampunk 4 hours ago | parent [-]

And where did the ad hominem part arise?

▲

ivewonyoung 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

https://human.libretexts.org/Under_Construction/Clean_Up_(Pr...

Search for "positive ad hominem".

▲

jauntywundrkind 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's all empty words.

> a very thorough and nuanced discussion

> bunch of smart investment / finance guys

> No click-bait-sky-is-falling content.

The middle one is the ad-hominem puffery. The rest isn't quite exactly 100% 'of the person's, but still doesn't give me any actual leads into what the content is: its just empty puffery.

	▲	possibleworlds an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> vacuous empty comments > saying sweet nothings > empty puffery By definition the only ad-hominem comments to be seen anywhere above.
	▲	dgellow 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[flagged]