Go look at open job listings at anthropic and the interview process. You aren’t allowed to use AI during coding assessments[0], or knowledge assessments, which suggests they very much do need and value hard skills and this is fluff.

[0] - https://www.anthropic.com/candidate-ai-guidance

▲

qwery 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not sure what point you're making.

I'm responding to the article they wrote and published.

If I worked there I would be embarrassed to have it publicised that I have been comitting 8 times as much code as I used to without even attempting to justify it.

▲

JohnMakin 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The point I am making is the article you are responding to is marketing hype and that they are lying. Their engineers, I am fairly sure, are doing engineering. At least to the point Anthropic's interview process is trying to filter for people with engineering skills, not "how do you best leverage AI to make more AI" skills like this seems to imply.

	▲	qwery 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You seem to have taken offense on behalf of the people working there. But I'm not attacking them nor seriously questioning their abilties/qualifications/performance. The slight reference I made to such was in an exclusive rhetorical device -- the situation presented cannot be, unless something unbelievable is occurring. It's the organisation, its culture, the greater culture surrounding it, and the marketing that I have a problem with. > they are lying Yes, it's incredible.