|
| ▲ | alansaber 9 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Exactly. Though with inference cost they're still only making money on enterprise use. |
|
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 8 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because we're all paying for LLM access for shits and giggles, and not because we're getting actual value from it. |
| |
| ▲ | vrganj 8 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't care why you pay for LLM access, it's still spamming my online forums and codebases. | | |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 8 days ago | parent [-] | | LLMs don't spam on their own. Take it up with people who wield them. | | |
| ▲ | ben_w 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | | They kinda do though, in that instances have been observed to send unrequited messages even when the person/people in charge of some account didn't expressly ask the models to do so. For my own use of LLMs, I do try to avoid anything which I know has a risk the artefacts they produce may end up DoSing or spamming, and I've avoided the OpenClaw-type pattern for a broader range of reasons of which this is simply one tiny part, but I'm not absolutely confident I could avoid this even in the code coming out of the free tier of the web chat interfaces except by checking every single line of output every single time. | |
| ▲ | vrganj 8 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nah, it's the technology's fault for enabling it. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | daveshistory 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Many companies would say that's the best kind of risk-reward balance. For them, anyway. |
