This is risk to us and reward for them though.

alansaber 9 days ago | parent | next [-]

Exactly. Though with inference cost they're still only making money on enterprise use.

TeMPOraL 8 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because we're all paying for LLM access for shits and giggles, and not because we're getting actual value from it.

I don't care why you pay for LLM access, it's still spamming my online forums and codebases.

LLMs don't spam on their own. Take it up with people who wield them.

	▲	ben_w 7 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They kinda do though, in that instances have been observed to send unrequited messages even when the person/people in charge of some account didn't expressly ask the models to do so. For my own use of LLMs, I do try to avoid anything which I know has a risk the artefacts they produce may end up DoSing or spamming, and I've avoided the OpenClaw-type pattern for a broader range of reasons of which this is simply one tiny part, but I'm not absolutely confident I could avoid this even in the code coming out of the free tier of the web chat interfaces except by checking every single line of output every single time.
	▲	vrganj 8 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Nah, it's the technology's fault for enabling it.

Many companies would say that's the best kind of risk-reward balance. For them, anyway.