Remix.run Logo
Launch HN: Hyper (YC P26) – Company brain to power agentic development
40 points by shalinshah 4 hours ago | 34 comments

Hey HN, we’re Shalin & Kanyes, best friends who've been hacking together for 10+yrs, and now founders of Hyper (https://heyhyper.ai/). Hyper is a shared “company brain” that plugs into information flowing inside a company to make AI agents and automations better and ultimately save people time.

Models have gotten good enough that they can (mostly) take on long-horizon, complex tasks. We believe the bottleneck now is that these smart-enough models often lack information about your company, which is scattered in people's heads, Slack threads, stale docs, and in back-and-forth convos with AI.

MCP is useful for getting some info in front of an agent, but there are problems: (1) Once the session dies, so does the insight, so instead of copy-pasting a whole doc each time you're telling the agent to dig through Drive each time - not much of a win; (2) Even when MCP works, what it gathers isn't comprehensive, because people decide things on a whiteboard, brainstorm out loud, post a little in Slack, and scribble the rest in a doc, which leaves the agent working from partial information; (3) And even if it had everything, it doesn't do the meta-reasoning required to do a great job. If you paste in a Notion doc and it won't learn your design taste or your writing style unless you tell it to, and it won't know why a decision was made or when.

As undergrads 5 years ago, we were into the tools-for-thought wave and became power users of Notion, Obsidian, Roam, Anki, real believers in building a second brain. After GPT-3.5 came out we started to realize how much more powerful that second brain could be if an AI could actually read it, because suddenly it would know our backstory, our taste, our preferences, and unlock genuinely new capabilities. That’s why we’re building Hyper.

We know it’s not for everybody! But for people who do want to be on the cutting edge, this is a force multiplier that makes agents faster and better. It increases the number of tasks they can do, and how effectively they do them.

Hyper works by ingesting everything you give it access to, Docs, Slack, Email, Calendar, Granola, and synthesizes it into a knowledge graph of facts and their relationships with embeddings for semantic search. The memory system we’ve built is hybrid, with two modalities. Episodes are the raw source items kept as the source of truth. Facts are the meaning pulled out of each episode, stored as subject-predicate-object records with a plain summary and timestamps for when the fact was introduced and when it was invalidated (subject=person, predicate=works_at, object=company). Facts form a graph with typed edges between them: X is in tension with Y, A is derived from B, J supersedes K. Every time a new fact comes in we update the facts in its neighborhood, so the graph stays current, and that's how we handle stale information. When "we'll ship Friday" is later contradicted by "we're shipping Monday," the new fact supersedes the old one instead of both looking equally true, and we never auto-discard the superseded version, so you can still ask how you landed on Monday.

Every fact carries provenance back to its source and access-control tags for who is allowed to see it. At retrieval we query-expand, then fuse semantic search over embeddings with Postgres full-text search using reciprocal rank fusion, and we only ever evaluate a query against the facts and episodes that person has access to, which means two people on the same team can ask the same question and get different answers. We keep information fresh with webhooks where they exist and polling where they don't, hashing contents to catch changes for sources that don’t handle native dedupe. Agents read and write through two paths: lifecycle hooks in tools like Claude Code, Cowork, Codex, and Cursor, where we inject relevant context on every prompt and pull interesting facts out of every response, and plain MCP tool calls for everything that doesn't expose hooks.

We love it! and so do our early users: one CEO uses Hyper to draft emails in his voice with full company context. What took hours/week now takes minutes and gets sharper each time Hyper learns more how he thinks and how his company is changing. Another YC founder one-shotted a launch video script because Hyper already knew their product, voice, positioning accumulated over months.

We have a 3-day free trial, explained more on our pricing page (https://heyhyper.ai/pricing) and there are more details in our FAQ (https://heyhyper.ai/faq), including things like privacy, compliance, and how we’re different from other “memory” companies..

Give it a spin! break it! and tell us where it falls short: https://heyhyper.ai/. We'd love to build you a 10-star experience :) Comments welcome!

jpathm 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Pretty cool. I understand the concept, but I wasn't able to get a clear answer on what the app actually does. Is it an MCP server? Or some viewer for my agent-compiled notes? Or just a UI for me to set up integrations? I got to the integrations page, but I'd like to understand what the app does before I just start connecting all my data.

FailMore 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Interesting product. I know others building in this space. How are things going with existing customers? And how are you measuring deltas vs standard agentic processes? Are you using RAG under the hood?

dennisy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Hey!

This looks great and congratulations on the launch.

I am also building in this space and wanted to get your views on a few things.

1. Are you building your own connectors to 3p systems? 2. How are you finding the sales motion? I found people to get the problem fast, but actually converting them seems rather slow.

Good luck!

kanyesrthaker an hour ago | parent [-]

Thanks! We build as much in-house as possible. We've found that this is the only way to really build an excellent end-user experience without putting any of the burden on the user. Regarding sales, we've found that the most useful thing has just been putting the product in people's hands and demonstrating that it gives upfront value. The hard part with memory is that most of the value comes with compounding, so we've had to get creative with how we can show in 5 minutes how Hyper lets you do things you couldn't do before.

dennisy an hour ago | parent [-]

Thanks for the replies!

Would love to swap notes at some point if you are up for it?

ianpri11 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Congrats on the launch!

How are you handling cases where multiple sources of truth contradict each other?

Does Hyper assume best guess or is there any human in the loop verification?

kanyesrthaker 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The current conflict resolution is fairly simple: always trust humans, and trust recent human info more than old human info. We're very aware that as the knowledge system gets more complex, we'll need more sophistication, including: - Human-in-the-loop verification - Role-based ranking, i.e. be more skeptical when an intern contradicts the CEO

Unlike many other memory systems, Hyper never actually deletes memories. It constantly reranks them based on confidence, which factors into how they're retrieved. So every statement has a full history and system of record for how it got there, and you can trace (with attribution) why Hyper gives the answers it does. If there's something that Hyper misses, we provide tools in-app and in-terminal-plugin that let a human explicitly correct what Hyper knows.

andy_ppp an hour ago | parent [-]

The intern probably knows more about their work than the CEO in 99% of orgs. The leaf nodes who do the work know more about anything than their managers (who think they know everything but, in most organisations, understand very little). Your system must keep the managers happy to be successful, which could prove a tricky circle to square.

kanyesrthaker an hour ago | parent [-]

fair enough :) that's why it's a hard problem! different people have different levels of "trustworthiness" and this is exactly the kind of implicit mental model that employees form over years of working at a company. Hyper aims to learn these things by being an active listener, and make decisions based on that knowledge.

implexa_founder 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I totally support you guys so don't take it as a dig! But isn't this mindblowing that while you were building and launching, Opus 4.8 launched and made a bunch of things you mentioned above irrelevant? for example, memory between sessions is way better, dynamic workflows will spin up a ton of agents to do work in parallel, and the ecosystem must provide better apis to be relevant (salesforce, uipath goind headless). Again always support startups so cheering for you, but man things are changing so fast!

kanyesrthaker 2 hours ago | parent [-]

totally, honestly it's super inspiring to see how fast the field is moving. That being said though, I think there's a long way to go in this category. Efficient memory across tools, especially in a multiplayer/collaborative setting, is largely unsolved. And it's really hard to build something so elegant and simple that it appeals to all the people in the world that really have this problem, beyond the power-users in industries that already have high AI/engineering adoption.

Every new advancement from the model providers helps unlock new capabilities, but we are confident this "brain" idea is going to be core infrastructure for every company in the future. It extends beyond code and project management: we think about "what does the 'office of the future' look like? Ambient recording in every room? Smart whiteboards that turn drawings -> CAD -> kick off 3d printers?" and it's exciting to see how many unsolved challenges are on that road. Appreciate the support and excited to keep building :)

m_kovar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nice job! But here is my idea: why not build an agentic AI workflow that mimics the streamlined production methods of Ford in the early 20th century? We already have extremely powerful models and APIs, but we still tend to cram everything into one employee's workstation without giving out different tasks to different people.

kanyesrthaker 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Interestingly enough, this is how Hyper is structured under the hood. Rather than have one mega-agent whose job it is to go in and try to solve every problem simultaneously, we prefer a "production line" of narrowly scoped agents to make small decisions to keep the knowledge graph up to date. More broadly, agent orchestration is a problem tightly coupled to the "shared brain" problem. Definitely exploring what this means for Hyper as we grow.

oliver236 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

arent there a bunch of products just like this one?

esafak 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

1. Have you measured the value provided by the knowledge graph layer over straight enterprise search (e.g., https://www.glean.com/) Benchmarks, please.

2. How do you deal with conflicting facts? In tech, the new is constantly replacing the old.

3. Is knowledge extraction real time? How fast is it in general?

shalinshah 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Appreciate the thoughtful questions.

1. I'll address this in two parts.

(a) Memory vs. Enterprise Search. I consider search to address targeted, stateless retrieval whereas memory solves temporal, tacit, and derived problems. Glean can tell you why a ticket was filed or answer a specific question regarding a customer call. But in many companies, important questions are broader: "What went wrong the first time we went with this vendor?" "How has our brand shifted in tone over time?". These cannot be answered by a few documents, and it's not obvious whether this information would be in Slack or Notion or Drive. It requires an active, entropy-fighting system that is going to extract information and keep track of how it evolves over time.

(b) Benchmarks: absolutely. Don't want to claim anything before we've published results, but Hyper scores very well on LoCoMo and LongMemEval, and we are constantly trying to bolster our set of evals. We will publish results more openly in the coming weeks. I will caveat though: many SOTA memory providers are converging on the top end of these benchmarks, and yet we don't see mass adoption. We believe that UX affordances are underrated and critical to get "company brains" working in real, messy businesses. Many of our users have come to us from other providers purely because the competition was too difficult to use and maintain across the org.

2. Hyper maintains a graph of information where each node is an extracted "fact." This happens continuously, in the background, live from every connector or connected agent. At insertion-time, new information is compared against relevant information. Our system (a DAG of agentic nodes) determines the relationships between these facts and makes appropriate updates: X derives Y, A updates B. For now, we rely on recency as the primary indicator of conflict (i.e. we assume more recent information is generally more true than old information). We realize that this will need to become more sophisticated, and are iterating.

3. Knowledge extraction is real-time and asynchronous, and should add next to zero latency to any existing system. We continually update the graph in our backend, without relying on a nightly compaction/dreams cycle, so information from the world should be reflected in Hyper's responses in close to real time. Retrieval can be slightly more expensive, but the latency is negligible compared to the overhead of the calling agent. We recognize the importance of performance (we both worked on on-device robotics!) and are happy to publish numbers as we measure them :)

oliver236 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

why not just vibe code this?

bensyverson 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How are you planning to handle California's CCPA?

kanyesrthaker 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Good question. User data is the right of the user. We don’t have automations for everything yet (we’re super early!) but any user has total right to request deletion, updates, or deliverance of their data, which we seek to comply with fully. You can find more information on our privacy and compliance progress here: https://heyhyper.ai/faq

dbbk 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This isn't a business

shalinshah an hour ago | parent [-]

Curious what you mean, why not? Business is just a group of people creating a product or service so valuable people are willing to pay more for it than it cost to build. In what way do you think Hyper does not fit that model?

nilirl 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> The self-driving company brain

Made me think this was for companies working on self-driving.

shalinshah 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes that's super fair feedback, we're changing the wording soon :)

kanyesrthaker 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Hey HN! Kanyes here, one of the cofounders of Hyper. Here all day to answer any questions :)

throw-hyper-01 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Tried it, none of the integrations work, they do not connect, notion, slack, etc... I think you probably posted this a bit too soon, IMHO. :/

kanyesrthaker 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Very strange, haven't seen this before. Could you shoot us an email at founders@heyhyper.ai with some more details about what you're seeing?

nils_transload 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Congrats!!

kanyesrthaker 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Thanks Nils!

zpoliczer 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Congrats!

kanyesrthaker 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Thank you! Very hot space right now and excited to be building in it

codelemons 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

congrats!

shalinshah 3 hours ago | parent [-]

thank you !

MagicMoonlight 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

dang 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Comments like this break the site guidelines - e.g. this one: "Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."

- as well as the Show HN guidelines, which apply when people are sharing their work:

"Be respectful. Anyone sharing work is making a contribution, however modest."

"When something isn't good, you needn't pretend that it is, but don't be gratuitously negative."

You're welcome to make your substantive points thoughtfully, but please don't post like this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html