| ▲ | varispeed an hour ago | |||||||
> that local models are good enough for whatever they're peddling they are not. Unless you are satisfied with plausible, but mostly garbage output. | ||||||||
| ▲ | cogman10 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
They are actually quite a bit better than you might think. Qwen3.6 27B is pretty capable at coding. For non-coding work, they are more than good enough. A lot of the ways my non-technical family members have interacted with AI would be perfectly served by using a local model. After all, people were more than satisfied with the results from GPT 3. That has long since been surpassed by open weight models. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | chadgpt3 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
isn't that literally all output an LLM generates? | ||||||||
| ▲ | throw1234567891 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I get results comparable to the saas. Maybe Anthropic sold you too much crack tokens. | ||||||||
| ▲ | fluoridation an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Honestly, that's the output I get from non-local models, anyway. If I'm going to get plausible nonsense either way, I may as well run it on my own hardware. | ||||||||