| ▲ | cogman10 an hour ago | |
They are actually quite a bit better than you might think. Qwen3.6 27B is pretty capable at coding. For non-coding work, they are more than good enough. A lot of the ways my non-technical family members have interacted with AI would be perfectly served by using a local model. After all, people were more than satisfied with the results from GPT 3. That has long since been surpassed by open weight models. | ||
| ▲ | Matticus_Rex 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
I'm sure there are things local models are good enough at in non-coding work, but for anything complex I do not find this to be the case. I'd say local models are fairly capable of even somewhat complex coding execution. For complex non-coding work (research, in-depth analysis, assembly of complex info-dense documents) I'd rather do it by hand than switch from Opus 4.7 to anything I could even theoretically run locally. | ||