So going forward expect US models to respond only in ways considered appropriate by the administration. If people thought models were producing slop before... lol.

You're absolutely right, abs-o-lutely, everybody says so. A lot, lot lot of people have been saying, you know they come to me and they say, "Mr. Claude, I can't believe the stuff I'm hearing, everybody is telling me he's right, is it true?" And I tell 'em, I say you're goddam right, that's what I say, but honestly folks, despite the negative press covfefe we've had a hell of a year, and that's really what it is with the nuclear folks, you can't trust em as far as you can throw em if you ask me, and believe me I've been throwing them around a LO<token limit exceeded>

Yea the details here really matter - is this truly a politically neutral security review to determine impact and potentially prepare for it - that seems alright.

is this a review of "wokeness" in models and rejecting them if they don't align with the party views - this should not be allowed.

A politically neutral committee that decides what the review entails is what would happen in a true democracy and not a puppet oligarchy like we have today.

No... executive orders are not laws, they can only command the federal government, not individuals or corporations. Meaning this is mostly pointless unless you're using models hosted by the government.

This will be an important thing to check going forward, but I don't see why we would presume that they're going to be subverted in this way. Importantly, this is a completely different problem space from "slop" as such - there's plenty of Chinese models that implement their censorship almost entirely through guardrails on what topics they're willing to discuss.

I foresee more Mecha Hitler in the future.