No... executive orders are not laws, they can only command the federal government, not individuals or corporations. Meaning this is mostly pointless unless you're using models hosted by the government.

▲

ofjcihen 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Models hosted or used by the government.

You left out the part containing the “barrels of money” incentive.

▲

bee_rider 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Executive orders aren’t laws (an important fact that should be repeated often and loudly). However, there’s probably room for the executive branch of the government to influence model hosts, as a major funder and consumer.

▲

xena 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Who is going to stop the federal government from enforcing them as if they were laws?

▲

ranger_danger 7 hours ago | parent [-]

The judicidial branch, so the courts. The government would have to sue the corporation to try to get them to do something, at which point (hopefully) the judge would strike it down.

▲

skeledrew 6 hours ago | parent [-]

What courts? Look at all that's been happening over the past months. How much of it have the courts been able to meaningfully impact, vs what's still in effect?

	▲	ranger_danger 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> How much of it have the courts been able to meaningfully impact A lot more than you think, apparently https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal...