|
| ▲ | jb_briant 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| It's not clear, there is no tangible proof that Mythos is not released because they don't have compute power to serve it. Saying that would imply that the "too dangerous" is a lie. Nobody has proof. It can feel "clear" for you, but it's not. Hence, I correct it. |
| |
| ▲ | jb_briant 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes I got how they used the phrase. And it was wrong, so I wanted to react. Thanks for your addition, it dissipates any doubt on the intention of OP: he thinks Anthropic is hiding the lack of power by pretending it's too dangerous. But he is wrong to assume that without proof, hence my reaction. | |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Agreed, but I'm talking about how they are, very clearly, using the phrase. |
|
|
| ▲ | WhitneyLand 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The not clear comment is valid by either interpretation. To a lot of us it’s not clear that’s what’s happening. It’s speculation and one possibility. It may also be a secondary consideration and not the primary gating factor. Anthropic has had their missteps but it’s still plausible to take what they say at face value. |
| |
| ▲ | jb_briant 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I agree, saying "it's clear" when at best, "it's plausible" doesn't let the conversation happen.
And pretending to know what is going on behind the scene, anon on HN is not credible |
|
