All of us, including you, know that he is not saying "they are being transparent." When someone says "it's clear that..." in this way they're saying "It's clear to us what is really happening here.

▲

jb_briant 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

It's not clear, there is no tangible proof that Mythos is not released because they don't have compute power to serve it. Saying that would imply that the "too dangerous" is a lie. Nobody has proof. It can feel "clear" for you, but it's not. Hence, I correct it.

	▲	jb_briant 17 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yes I got how they used the phrase. And it was wrong, so I wanted to react. Thanks for your addition, it dissipates any doubt on the intention of OP: he thinks Anthropic is hiding the lack of power by pretending it's too dangerous. But he is wrong to assume that without proof, hence my reaction.
	▲	Forgeties79 22 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Agreed, but I'm talking about how they are, very clearly, using the phrase.

▲

WhitneyLand 30 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

The not clear comment is valid by either interpretation.

To a lot of us it’s not clear that’s what’s happening. It’s speculation and one possibility.

It may also be a secondary consideration and not the primary gating factor.

Anthropic has had their missteps but it’s still plausible to take what they say at face value.

	▲	jb_briant 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I agree, saying "it's clear" when at best, "it's plausible" doesn't let the conversation happen. And pretending to know what is going on behind the scene, anon on HN is not credible