| ▲ | bluegatty an hour ago | |||||||
There's nothing normal at all about the Nvidia Groq deal, it's hard to read in terms of what it means. A straight licensing deal would have been easier to ingest. | ||||||||
| ▲ | fontain an hour ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I could be completely off the mark but I thought the non-exclusive license was necessary because Groq’s datacenter business uses the technology already? Nvidia acquired the assets but Groq needed to retain rights to use the technology for their own product. | ||||||||
| ||||||||