| ▲ | fontain an hour ago | |
I could be completely off the mark but I thought the non-exclusive license was necessary because Groq’s datacenter business uses the technology already? Nvidia acquired the assets but Groq needed to retain rights to use the technology for their own product. | ||
| ▲ | wmf an hour ago | parent [-] | |
They could have sold the IP then licensed it back. The nonexclusive part was purely a fig leaf to dodge antitrust. | ||