| ▲ | Uzazo 5 hours ago |
| The described behavior would not happen when you use a custom OS. I understand not wanting to give Motorola any money because of this, though. |
|
| ▲ | Cider9986 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| True. Google does much worse things overall, but they aren't as surface-level scammy as this. |
|
| ▲ | 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | gib444 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The tail never wags the dog. Initially the project won't change, but it likely will over time. |
| |
| ▲ | microtonal 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | But AFAIK it doesn't work like that. Motorola makes a phone that has an unlockable bootloader, provides firmware bundles, etc., but the OS images will be made by the GrapheneOS team and they would never do anything like that. (I think the misunderstanding is that Motorola would make the GrapheneOS builds.) | | |
| ▲ | gib444 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I'm misunderstanding nothing You're probably just not willing to believe that a 'partnership' with a massive company will change things, like I do. I am disagreeing, not misunderstanding. There's a difference | | |
| ▲ | microtonal 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Have you ever observed the GrapheneOS team? I have rarely seen any team more principled than them, outside maybe RMS. Time will tell, but my bet is on the GrapheneOS team doing the right thing, they have always done so in the past. |
|
|
|
