| ▲ | mmh0000 an hour ago | |
Ah, so you agree NFS is not fit for purpose (network file sharing), and I should use something else to share files over the network. EDIT (the above is a bit more snark than I intended, let me add a little more): NFS's direct (still widely used) competitor, SMB, natively supports:
With SMB, I can share out a directory on the network that allows visitors access, optionally authenticated with a simple username and password.I can share out specific directories with easy control over who can access what. You know, basic network file sharing capabilities. [[ And, don't take this as a love for SMB, it too has many issues and legacy junk ]] | ||
| ▲ | skydhash 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
> Ah, so you agree NFS is not fit for purpose (network file sharing), and I should use something else to share files over the network NFS stands for Network File System, not Network File Sharing. If you gave a disk to someone, the permission bits wouldn’t stand for anything too. | ||