| ▲ | I’ve built a virtual museum with nearly every operating system you can think of(virtualosmuseum.org) |
| 400 points by andreww591 4 hours ago | 86 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | neilv 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Impressive curation effort. One comment: at least a few of the examples in the gallery seem to be of the "last, greatest" version, which actually isn't necessarily the greatest, and definitely not the most interesting. For example, the "Domain_OS SR10.4 - 01 VUE desktop" is a bit confusing, and may cause people to miss actual DomainOS. Apollo DomainOS (or Domain/IX, or simply Domain) had many unique and interesting things about it, but disappeared soon after being acquired by HP. It looked more like it might look if you took a programmer who had mostly only seen text terminals, and gave them a megapixel display with pixel framebuffer, a mouse, and the freedom to design the keyboard hardware, and told them to make what they would want to use. VUE (around when the Unix workstation vendors collaborated on standarding on a common desktop environment) was for HP-UX , which was a very different operating system, and entirely different user experience. More of an early attempt at let's give non-power-users an accessible computer with virtual desktops and everything. Similarly, Solaris had innovative OpenWindows (including but not limited to a networkable display system based on PostScript) before they got the common desktop environment. SunOS 4.x (retronym "Solaris 1.x") and earlier could run the earlier SunView environment, which was more like monochrome early Mac than the later Open Look look and feel of OpenWindows. |
|
| ▲ | simonh 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No Pick? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pick_operating_system My first actual job was working for a local health authority here in the UK, and they had a Pick computer running some database application thing, I think to do with accounting. I had to run the backups. Sorry to be a whinger, I don't mean to belittle the monumental amount of work. |
| |
| ▲ | HeyLaughingBoy a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | Ha. My first SW job interview was for a programmer on a Pick system at some small company in Manhattan. I think they were involved in publishing or something. Anyway, the salary they offered was so pitifully low all I could do was politely decline. Was too young to even know that I could negotiate. | |
| ▲ | patja 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Similar experience here. I worked on an ERP system for a chemical distributor that ran on 5 Honeywell Ultimate systems distributed across the US. General ledger, order management, warehouse order pick lists, chemical recipes, MSDS data, inventory, etc. We synced database updates every night, and once a month someone had to spend the night in the datacenter swapping 9 track tapes for backups. I loved working in Pick BASIC on those systems. So much you could do with "dict items" | |
| ▲ | CalRobert an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | What a legendary name for the developer. |
|
|
| ▲ | eichin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I hadn't realized Domain/OS emulation was viable these days. It's one of the few systems that has actually "lost" features - the terminal-window-like thing (called pads, I think?) when in line mode had a dividing line at the bottom where your unconsumed typeahead was visible and you could continue to edit it until it got read - not just one line, the entire unconsumed input. (Not that it's a particularly desirable feature - it's just one that I'm pretty sure you can't implement with ptys...) |
| |
| ▲ | bilegeek 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Unfortunately, pre-Domain/OS AEGIS is basically lost. One person popped up with talk of imaging their 9.6 floppies, but I haven't seen anything since then. [1]https://www.facebook.com/groups/retrocomputers/posts/7062462... | | |
| ▲ | neilv 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I wonder whether this could still pop up at estate sales, or when a retiree is cleaning out their garage. Not all gear got junked. When I was a teen intern, I got some obsolete Apollos (and 2 logic analyzers and a terminal) from my employer, and other people were also bringing home gear the company "sold" them. Somewhere, there might well be a industry or university sysadmin or programmer who brought home a box of old QIC tapes, and one of them says "AEGIS" on the label, and it's in a a garage/attic. Also, rumor has it that at one point Boeing physically archived at least one Apollo network, because they apparently take documentation integrity extremely seriously. If that's true, they might have an engineering librarian or someone who could take an interest in making sure any versions of Aegis/Domain they need (and have preserved media for) can run on emulators or something? |
| |
| ▲ | compsciphd 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | why could you not implement it as ptys. Currently the terminal doesn't really process input itself, it just gives the program running the "raw" fd. If instead the terminal gave the processes a pipe (for instance) and consumed all the pty input itself (and its end of the pipe being a buffer of that content), why wouldn't it be the same? | |
| ▲ | glhaynes 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What an amazingly goofy (but also kinda maybe makes sense?) feature! |
|
|
| ▲ | a1o 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Do you have that Windows 3.1 version that came with the Compaq that had the DE that was like a paper folder instead of an empty desktop, and that you could put the icons in the different tabs of the paper folder? |
| |
| ▲ | simianpirate 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I believe you are speaking of Tabworks? | | |
| ▲ | a1o an hour ago | parent [-] | | I had to Google and it does look like it, I remember the computer would boot into it and it also had space for a few (three?) icons outside the tabs (like in the “desktop”). It was a cool interface! |
| |
| ▲ | Avamander 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Your comment reminds me of HP's obscure EFI OS called QuickLook. I would guess there are a lot of obscure OSs out there. | | | |
| ▲ | andreww591 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think I've heard of an alternate shell/launcher like that before. Do you remember what it was called? |
|
|
| ▲ | wattzee an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How can I speak with the heavens if you don't have temple OS. |
|
| ▲ | liquidise 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This triggered a rabbit hole search that had me rediscover Packard Bell Navigator[1]. The nostalgia and joy this page brings me is hard to describe. I hope everyone remembers their formative tech journey so fondly. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packard_Bell_Navigator |
| |
| ▲ | MisterTea an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Oh, this made me dig up a memory: What was that skeuomorphic music player Packard Bell would bundle with Windows 3.1? It looked like a stack of stereo equipment with a CD player, MIDI player and wav player/recorder. When I was a kid I loved how it looked like a stereo system and grabbed a copy from a friend. I also remember being greatly disappointing when it would not run on Windows 95. | |
| ▲ | AlecSchueler 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I never experienced it but somehow I still feel nostalgic for it. For all we've gained there's so much we've lost as well, I'm sad my kids won't grow up with anything like this. | | |
| ▲ | CalRobert an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | For all we've gained... the social media site I have the healthiest relationship with is basically just text and would run fine on a machine from 1998. Sure, some parts of modernity are nice (I don't miss having to call taxi companies) but I could do without a lot of it. | |
| ▲ | Keyframe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The maturity brought upon us homogenized experience. 90's user interfaces were something else, man. |
| |
| ▲ | quietfox 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Oh this is that this was called. A long time ago, like in Googles earlier stages, I tried so hard to find this from my memory, but I failed and over the years forgot about it. Thanks for bringing it up again. |
|
|
| ▲ | justmarc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| An amazing, herculean effort! thumbs up to Andrew This preservation of old OS is important. Spread the word, this needs to reach anyone who's interested in it. |
|
| ▲ | StayTrue 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Reminds me of the alt.sysadmin.recovery canonical list of operating systems that suck. https://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/humor/Unix/os-suck.html |
| |
| ▲ | yard2010 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > NextStep sucks, but it's pretty. macOS sucks, but it's pretty | |
| ▲ | bkircher an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Linux sucks differently every time a kernel is released. |
|
|
| ▲ | SkiFire13 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is there a way to see a list of the operating systems included without having to download and run the tool? |
| |
| ▲ | cf100clunk 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I hope so, and also that it is a plain black-and-white list. | | |
| ▲ | VLM an hour ago | parent [-] | | I can't figure out how to find a list and I believe that's intentional to avoid simplistic copyright search and takedown type of problems. It is aggravating how little information is available on the website. 1) I run my own systems in emulation and its always educational to see how other people handle configuration and sysadmin type problems. Much like programmers reading other programmer's code for educational purposes. 2) I have a genuine philosophical question which it appears I cannot answer by any means simpler than running it and trying it. Similar to the halting problem LOL. I wonder how the project handles operating systems like MVS/360 where there exists a perfectly good 1960s installation (which I have installed by hand from tape for the experience) however no one uses that IRL because the various MVS Turnkey projects provide seemingly infinite debugged and dependency organized patch sets. There's quite a difference between trying to white knuckle a homemade bare basic MVS/360 from the 1960s vs "MVS Turnkey 4" which basically just works out of the box. Another example of #2 above is there's DEC PDP-8 OS-8 which technically boots... but the most common distro had a non-working but trivially fixable FORTRAN compiler (IIRC the runtime package filename was wrong or something similar). There's a lot of fun customization. Another example of #2 above is I wonder how the author handles RSX-11M, distribute the ancient unpatched unmodified OS from DEC or ship something like the Billquist distro, or does the author ship the PiDP-11 RSX-11M (or is PiDP-11 shipping the Billquist RSX-11 distro now?) I guess for people not into retrocomputing it would be like claiming some rando RedHat .iso from the 90s is "The" Linux operating system. Well, its "a" linux from one instant in time... Likewise there seems to be no "The" MVS/360 operating system there's a zillion possible local installs of all capability levels and eras, all very different and fun. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | DrBurrito 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not a single OS/2 screenshot.. |
|
| ▲ | nonamenoslogan 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is stellar. I've been doing this for a few years myself, but I thought I was killing it with like 70ish OSs. Thank you for all your work! |
| |
| ▲ | drittich an hour ago | parent [-] | | And I thought I was killing it just saving some install disk images! |
|
|
| ▲ | jzer0cool an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For those experience with some of these OS, what might be something to explore (try) on these OS for some learning objective. Any call outs feature wise? |
|
| ▲ | nlitsme 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| quite a decent collection. and actual working osses. one that i noticed missing: Novell Netware, I spent several years in de 90s developing software for it. It was the main office network server software on those days. 3.x, 4.x ran on relatively regular 32-bit PC server hardware.
2.x ran on the 80286 in protected mode, the only OS I know which did that. Copies can be found at archive.org. |
| |
| ▲ | whartung 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Mind, I never used Netware. But, originally wasn't it mostly a network system to support network printers and file systems? BTRIEVE would run on top of that. But, as I understand it, Netware wasn't required. They just went together really well. Finally, especially with Netware 386, they supported "NLMs". "Netware Loadable Modules". This was what let you deploy applications to the network server. Some databases ported to that I believe. I think Informix had a NLM version of Informix OnLine. So, to me, early Netware seemed more an interesting network utility more so than what I, at least, would consider an "OS". Perhaps it was an OS, but just sealed off. At least until NLMs arrived, making the system more extensible. I have no idea what facilities were available to NLMs, or how they were developed. | |
| ▲ | MisterTea an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > 3.x, 4.x ran on relatively regular 32-bit PC server hardware. 2.x ran on the 80286 in protected mode, the only OS I know which did that. My friends father worked for a shipping company and their office ran off a 286 Netware server until the early 2000's. It was a big white label tower with classic orange monochrome monitor and large Epson dot matrix printer with tractor feed paper. |
|
|
| ▲ | semireg 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| My first operating system and GUI was GEOS on the Commodore 64. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEOS_(8-bit_operating_system) |
|
| ▲ | Evidlo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I would suggest to crop your screenshots down to the OS being featured. It's a bit confusing to see a picture labeled as IBM AIX but then see GNOME 2 window decorations everywhere. |
|
| ▲ | salted-cacao an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Some of these are runnable in the browser, for example here: https://copy.sh/v86/ |
|
| ▲ | NikolaNovak 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Pardon a simple question - this implies nested virtualization, or is the second step emulation? The download is a Linux VM, gotcha. Are other OS-s nested virtual machines inside that Linux VM, or emulators (in which case, holly mackerel, that is even more impressive :O... and also why??). Readme seems to imply it's emulators, but it also uses the words "virtual/virtualization" or "VM images" liberally sprinkled. |
| |
| ▲ | gwynforthewyn 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I imagine the author's using OpenSIMH (https://opensimh.org) or something similar, so it'd be an emulated CPU running the userlands. I have a container that runs a 4.3 BSD userland using opensimh; it's not super hard to set up, just takes a bit of patience and willingness to learn how opensimh works. |
|
|
| ▲ | pfcd 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Also might be of interest: http://www.typewritten.org/ |
| |
|
| ▲ | cortesoft 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I just love passion projects like this. One person does a ton of work because they care about the thing, and then shares it with the world so everyone can enjoy it. |
|
| ▲ | erickhill 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The rarest possible choice for Amiga (Amiga UNIX) represented. Curious thing to do. Fun project site either way. |
|
| ▲ | sdbillin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Could really do with a torrent. 120GB at 3MB/sec... |
| |
| ▲ | dmitrygr an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | If my download ever finishes i'll spin up a torrent. So far on retry/resume #11, 62.4/120GB done (i am live updating this comment as long as i can) | |
| ▲ | Teever 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah I tried to tell him that the other day… I think he under estimated the popularity that this would have on HN and thought that cloudflare would be able to handle it |
|
|
| ▲ | rogster 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is wonderful. I'm looking forward to looking thru it properly. My earliest "real computer" memories are VAX/VMS and SunTools... |
| |
| ▲ | whartung 21 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I wrote a SunTools front end to a simulation hosted on a VAX. I don't recall how we moved the data back and forth (serial port of some kind, most likely). I also can't recall "what it was like using SunTools and SunView". Just that, whatever or however it was done, I managed to get it to work. :) |
|
|
| ▲ | llsf 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| THANK YOU! This is a treasure trove. And glad you made the whole museum downloadable, so this treasure does not get lost. |
|
| ▲ | delichon 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don't see HAL or WOPR or Skynet or GLaDOS. |
|
| ▲ | TrackerFF 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Just a couple of years ago I worked for a client who had a computer with Solaris 2.x running. It was quite a critical piece in the system. |
|
| ▲ | jschveibinz 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| VMS? I didn't see it listed. |
|
| ▲ | sagarp an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Where's Microsoft Bob? |
| |
| ▲ | Someone an hour ago | parent [-] | | That wasn’t an operating system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob: “Microsoft Bob was a Microsoft software product intended to provide a more user-friendly interface for the Windows 3.1, Windows 95 and Windows NT operating systems, supplanting the Windows Program Manager.“ |
|
|
| ▲ | kingleopold 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Great work! please just offer dark mode |
|
| ▲ | dchftcs 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd love to go back to the 90s and live it again. |
| |
| ▲ | dfxm12 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | A Mister does a good job of recreating period appropriate load times and quirks. You can put it in whatever old computer case you're most nostalgic for, connect an old CRT monitor and most peripherals should have some USB converter if necessary. |
|
|
| ▲ | Narishma 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Scrolling is extremely laggy. |
|
| ▲ | kramit1288 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| quite impressive, how did you collected? just find images online or you actually have all of these OS. |
|
| ▲ | tankenmate 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| TENEX and TOPS-20 would be nice |
| |
|
| ▲ | cf100clunk 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hug of death? Error code 522 on downloads. |
|
| ▲ | strrl 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I didn't see ryOS |
|
| ▲ | ChrisArchitect 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Blog post: https://andreww591.blogspot.com/2026/05/ive-released-virtual... |
|
| ▲ | AnimalMuppet 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Wow. That was a bit of nostalgia, just to read some of the names. |
| |
| ▲ | juvoly 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah! Browsing through the screenshots truly feels like watching vintage porn. | | |
| ▲ | hoansdz 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can only view the operating system, you can't view those websites again, haha. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | newer_vienna 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is TempleOS in here? |
| |
|
| ▲ | Teever 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Very neat to see this project come to completion Andreww. Are there any any operating systems that you'd like to add to the collection but haven't been able to find? Maybe someone here at HN could help with that. |
|
| ▲ | theYipster 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is awesome. |
|
| ▲ | prettyjosn 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This is great |