| ▲ | brookst 6 hours ago | |
Wait, how would limiting a great tool to 0.1% of the TAM demonstrate caring for humans? Are you picturing them running a lottery for who’s allowed to use it, or an auction? And with the loss of scale economies, it would have to be much more expensive. So you end up charging, what, $10,000/month and only making it available to the very wealthy? I don’t see how this game plan is better for humans. And I’m honestly not being snarky. Have you thought through how your proposed limits would work? Am I missing something? | ||
| ▲ | troyvit 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I mean look at how Apple prices their computers and phones, or how WSJ charges for subscriptions, or how "Linux" keeps its market small by being awful at marketing. The point is there are plenty of ways to scale sustainably and support your customer base in a long-term way that keeps them, and it doesn't seem like Anthropic is doing that. | ||