| ▲ | TrackerFF 3 hours ago |
| For the past days I've been participating(albeit over Teams) in a conference relevant to my industry (intel), basically startups and established companies showcasing their products to a closed audience of EU gov. officials. One thing I noticed right away, is that all companies were asked "Can we fully host this from within EU or our country" from the various people in audience. Every single one. Many of the startups had slides prepared for this. Definitely a change, because it is not something I can recall being important just a couple of years ago. |
|
| ▲ | embedding-shape 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Definitely a change, because it is not something I can recall being important just a couple of years ago. I work as a consultant and freelancer across a bunch of companies, some American but mostly European ones. Last ~8 months or so, the sentiment about "Hosting our data in EU or even our own country" has drastically changed, I don't think I've seen such a clear shift in public opinion so fast before. The amount of migrations I've helped moving data from US to EU already is higher this calendar year than all the other years of my career. |
| |
| ▲ | weberer 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | >I don't think I've seen such a clear shift in public opinion so fast before Its not about public opinion, but rather data sovereignty requirements. Certain types of data must be processed within servers located in the EU, regardless of where the company's HQ is. That's why you see most SaaS platforms nowadays offer a EU-only version. | | |
| ▲ | englishrookie a minute ago | parent | next [-] | | Well, there are also noises about the SaaS company preferably not being American. Apparently there's a US law that compels US companies to divulge data on their users even if the data is hosted outside of the US. (I'm not sure this wouldn't happen anyway, without such a law.) | |
| ▲ | riccardomc 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | It is definitely also about public opinion and it is going to be translated into laws soon enough (i.e. governments mandate data sovereignty). Recent erratic policies are having a profound effect on perception of US companies. It has been brewing for a while. https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/02/27/is-overreliance-on-... |
| |
| ▲ | 2muchcoffeeman 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Surely there would have been mumblings in certain sectors of the EU since the first Trump administration? It’s just that they started to execute now? | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There been mumblings for as long as I've been a developer, I remember hearing about "EU data independence" first when the ePrivacy Directive came around, which must have been multiple decades ago at this point. But yeah, in recent times the sentiment became more urgent. If I were to guess, with zero data in front of me and just judging by what I remember, I think the sentiment really changed first with the ICC blockade that happened last year, then it got really fueled on by the US threats to Greenland's sovereignty, I think that's when organizations and people really got stressed out about moving ASAP. | | |
| ▲ | spockz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Around me, the threat to Greenland is what kicked the plans from “okay what mitigations should we envision?” to “alright, let’s go as far to actually run shadow ops to get acquainted with …” to full on move after the invasion. | |
| ▲ | vanschelven an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Trump may genuinely end up being the best salesman European hosting companies ever had. I run one of the tools mentioned in this post (Bugsink) and I literally had an uptick of Danish people/companies (specifically) reaching out to me after Davos. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | parent [-] | | As someone who've basically started being known as "The guy who helps you move data out of US to Europe" in certain circles, I'm not complaining either :) |
| |
| ▲ | pjc50 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, that was the thing that set off all the alarms. Trump 1 said a lot of things but had not completed the Hungary-fication of the US. Trump 1 was also before the Ukraine war! |
| |
| ▲ | palata 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I feel like the concern started getting popularised during the first Trump administration, because the US were overtly bullying the EU (and others of course). But the main change was that it was done overtly: before that the US has always been a big power trying to... say "defend the interests of the US" abroad. E.g. the US have been spying their allies forever. So I think it was more of a "they should stop bullying us in a few years", and indeed it went back to normal with Biden (again, "defending the interests of the US" and "leveraging their dominant position", which was kind of accepted). The second Trump administration moved from "overtly bullying" to "behaving like a potential threat". In the second Trump administration, the US has used the tech monopolies against the EU and has become a military threat (not to mention the commercial war with tariffs). For many Europeans, it's not that the US are abusing their dominant position in negotiations anymore: it's that they are not an ally anymore. Not that they are seen as an enemy, but rather an unreliable partner who threatened to become an enemy. I think that this is a very big shift, and that is why things are actually moving. And I don't think that this will change, because the risk of depending on the US monopolies has now materialised. That cannot be undone. | | | |
| ▲ | vga1 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, AWS even was trying to found a EU sovereign cloud precisely for this reason. https://aws.eu/ I haven't heard of anyone moving to this, though. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I guess they eventually read their own local (US) laws and figured no one cares about that effort since Amazon is still covered by CLOUD Act, regardless of what ccTLD they happen to use for their landing page. > The CLOUD Act primarily amends the Stored Communications Act (SCA) of 1986 to allow federal law enforcement to compel U.S.-based technology companies via warrant or subpoena to provide requested data stored on servers regardless of whether the data are stored in the U.S. or on foreign soil. Once that was in place, AWS could host their "EU" servers on the moon for all I and others care, still not a solution to avoid the claws of the US. |
| |
| ▲ | patrickmcnamara 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Trump 2 is worse than Trump 1 by far from EU perspective. And it also proved that it wasn't a once-off that Americans will vote in someone who threatens to dismantle NATO, invade Greenland, or start trade wars with allies for no reason. | | |
| ▲ | vga1 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Also Trump 2 proves without a doubt that at least half of the american voters are absolutely insane or incredibly stupid. For 1 there used to be some doubt. We in Europe are enjoying roughly 15-20% insane/stupid ratings at this point, which is not great but still a bit better. | |
| ▲ | rapnie 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Let's face it. Trump 2 is about dismantling democracy. The administration radiates hostility and aggression to anything democratic. In the new national security policy the EU is the adversary of the US. If that isn't a wake-up call. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Trump 2 is about dismantling democracy Seems strange to me that not everyone, including republicans, aren't aware of this, when he's pretty outspoken about not wanting any more elections, and how "if you vote for me this time, it'll be the last time you have to vote". If a presidential candidate anywhere else was openly talking about wanting to remove elections and democracy in the country (not to mention triggered an insurrection [?!]), I'm fairly sure they'd almost be automatically disqualified. Really strange situation all around. | | |
| ▲ | tcp_handshaker 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | >Seems strange to me that not everyone, including republicans, aren't aware of >this, when he's pretty outspoken about not wanting any more elections, and how >"if you vote for me this time, it'll be the last time you have to vote". 1) Puerto Ricans were called publicly on a Trump rally in New York, an "island of garbage" and they massively voted for Trump. - Second generation Latinos, whose many parents, and grand parents and other close family are illegal immigrants, were repeatedly warned of what would happen, and its one of the constitutions, that massively voted for Trump... - Trump continued to state, as late as 2024,that the Central Park Five were responsible for the 1989 rape of a woman in the Central Park jogger case, despite the five males having been officially exonerated in 2002.
- Trump was a leading proponent of the debunked birther conspiracy theory falsely claiming president Barack Obama was not born in the United States
- Trump and his company Trump Management were sued by the Department of Justice for housing discrimination against African-American renters. Donald Trump made big gains with Black voters in 2024. - Trump is a convicted rapist and felon, and is known 44 million women voted for him... We are past strange, and we are in the phase of electorate deserves what they voted for. | |
| ▲ | frumplestlatz 20 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sources for those quotes would be very helpful for anyone interested in this, because I’ve certainly never heard this before. We’re two years into his term and democracy does not appear to be dismantled, or even remotely at risk of being dismantled. I also expect the same or similar accusations to be leveled at the next Republican candidate, who if elected, will also not “dismantle democracy”. | | |
| ▲ | tcp_handshaker 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | >> Sources for those quotes would be very helpful for anyone interested in this, because I’ve certainly never heard this before. Asking for a quote of what he said so many times, and that is so easily found with a basic web search, says a lot about your comment. | |
| ▲ | Alacart 11 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Here is a video of him saying it: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bTm0du4kUH0 | | |
| ▲ | frumplestlatz a minute ago | parent [-] | | Thanks for the context. He’s speaking to evangelical Christians that do not regularly vote, and in the context of instituting voter ID to secure future elections. ID is required to vote in most (all?) EU states. |
|
| |
| ▲ | nyeah an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
| |
| ▲ | mrits 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | From the a US perspective, EU hate each other and I see no way any temporary cohesiveness will last. Most EU countries are just as likely to elect a Trump in the next decade | | |
| ▲ | palata an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > EU hate each other I see how it may look like this from the outside. But I think it would be like saying that siblings hate each other because you witnessed an argument. Most people in most EU countries consider the other EU countries as allies, even though they don't agree on everything. Now the fact that 27 countries argue means that they talk to each other. I think it's a lot less polarised than in the US. Or course there are extremes too. | | |
| ▲ | gmueckl 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | The EU needs to be more vigilant than ever, though. Russia has been trying to export their nationalistic totalitarianism to the EU for decades and now the US has openly declared a goal of exporting their brand of blind ignorant nationalism to the EU as well. Both influences will boost alt-right parties if successful. The obvious intended outcome for both powers is a EU that is breaking up from the inside. On the positive side, this shows that the EU has gained a level of international influence that is taken very seriously by other major powers. It's not 100% certain that it will survive this current wave of assaults, but if it does, it will be even stronger. | |
| ▲ | pjc50 28 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I have no idea how you'd measure it, but I suspect Republican states hate Democrat ones more than most European countries hate each other. Listen to the way they talk about California and New York. |
| |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > EU hate each other What gave you the impression that EU members hate each other? It'd be a weird union if that was the case. Not saying it's not possible, I just haven't seen it myself, although I am a Swede so clearly I do hate the Danes and the Norrbaggar with passion, but it's love-hate, not hate-hate. | | |
| ▲ | rapnie an hour ago | parent [-] | | Likely OP refers to individual countries and quarreling leaders often favoring national interests to what would be best for the union. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > leaders often favoring national interests to what would be best for the union If we're talking about leaders for member states, then they're doing their job right :) They're not meant to figure out what's best for the union, we have separate elections for those people who go to EU and represent the country + care about the union. The national "leaders" of the country are quite expected to put national interests above what's best for the union :) |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | solumunus 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Trump wasn't threatening to invade European countries and supporting Putin's position in an ongoing war in term 1. He has been far more outwardly anti-EU in term 2. |
| |
| ▲ | AllanSavageDev 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | EU hosting their own ops like they built the Airbus A380: Database runs in France, front end in Belgium, Operations in Spain... EU Fairness dictates they all need to get a slice of the pie so this will be interesting (and by that I mean absurdly hilarious). | | |
| ▲ | SlinkyOnStairs 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > EU hosting their own ops like they built the Airbus A380:
> Database runs in France, front end in Belgium, Operations in Spain... You snark, but is this not EXACTLY how a sizeable majority of modern apps are made? Substitute in some random tech stacks, cloud providers, or buzzwords. Database runs in AWS, front end in Nuxt, Operations in Claude. | | | |
| ▲ | WJW 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Like NASA rockets don't have components whose manufacture is very carefully distributed over all US states just to keep the senators happy. In any case, there are plenty of EU giants (ASML, SAP, Siemens, Alstom, Rheinmetall, etc) that are rather concentrated geographically speaking. EU fairness is more a government agency distribution thing, not for private companies. | |
| ▲ | Arkhaine_kupo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Isnt that how american contracts work? You put your Headquarters in seattle, your data center in alabama, you have your dev team in SF... every state gets a slice Like gov contracts and how they are divided is basically the largest conversation in defense contracts, they give more of a shit who will make the nails for a tank than the security parameters of the crew members | | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah, I guess we replaced globalism with Europalism, since some of the other parties who initially pushed for globalism now wants nothing to do with it anymore. Oh well, I'm looking forward to closer connections and relationships to our French and Belgian brothers and sisters :) | |
| ▲ | riccardomc 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Better than Boeing, I guess... | |
| ▲ | thesquandered 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | An entire continent's sentiment shifting to pull market share away from your team is nothing to snark at, regardless of whether the first iteration works perfectly out of the box. I can guarantee you someone in Europe is smart enough to eventually get their needs sorted. | |
| ▲ | raincole 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think we're going to witness a very inefficient system getting brought to work by policies alone. And I'm not even bashing EU. The closest example still working today is probably the US's Jones Act. | |
| ▲ | libertine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
| |
| ▲ | blululu an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Out of curiosity how much of this is a manifestation of the utility of LLMs? I get the current political impetus right now but also the barrier for swapping out an infra stack was also much higher 2 years ago. From my own projects major swaps are now relatively trivial which means that vendor lock in is weak. | | |
| ▲ | grey-area an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Precisely none of it is related to LLMs. It's related to the political situation and the possibility of trade war and tariffs. | | |
| ▲ | Scarblac an hour ago | parent [-] | | And actual war, given the threats to Greenland. But especially that Microsoft blocked the work email of the ICC lead prosecutor for political reasons, that has all alarm bells ringing. | | |
| ▲ | tcp_handshaker 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Given how bad the US military performed against Iran, its pretty clear that any hostilities started by the US against NATO, would finish with a takeover of Washington within...2 weeks... | |
| ▲ | crote 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | And of course the actions in Iran and Venezuela, demonstrating that even the most braindead threats aren't just empty bluffing. |
|
| |
| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Besides some companies that were deep into the weeds of AWS and been pushed to enable and use every single AWS service by their reps, I don't think it's much harder/easier today than it was two years ago. Sure, LLMs help a bit with the actual typing, but the hard part is still planning, alignment and actual execution, all which are best done by humans talking and working with other humans. I don't think we're in the days of "Hey Codex migrate our AWS stack 100% to Hetzner VPS stat" yet, without issues along the way. Wouldn't claim it's impossible either, but again the easy parts were already easy, and the hard parts are still hard. | | |
| ▲ | ghaff an hour ago | parent [-] | | Architecting to make portability easier should absolutely be a thing. But people in the weeds of a specific public cloud provider today will absolutely need to make tradeoffs between getting to a position where they can be more portable and devoting those resources to other things. | | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Architecting to make portability easier should absolutely be a thing. It is, but it's really hard to make the right trade-offs. Usually I'd start by basically making a list of what could potentially be done to make it easier, check lightly how hard each one of those will be, then sit down with stakeholders and figure out the balance between how fast they want to move, and how risky they want the migration to be. Some opts for less safeguards and moving sooner, others for absolutely less risk but it takes the time it takes. |
|
| |
| ▲ | vga1 26 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Some. Many companies have relied in the past on the fact that doing things is freaking complicated. Such as maintaining your own services instead of using something from a provider like AWS. What used to be a half year transition project that will be half-assed due to resource constraints, can now be properly done in a month by a skilled engineering team works on it with LLM leverage. Of course, if America was still a trusted ally (like if Harris was president), we still wouldn't be doing it. Even if it was easy now. | |
| ▲ | riccardomc 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | zero. It is a manifestation of the commoditization of Cloud Computing Interfaces. Every provider offers a blob storage, kubernetes clusters, queues and what not. I'd argue that covers 90% of SaaS needs. | |
| ▲ | ambicapter an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | How do LLMs help with the mechanics of switching infrastructure stacks? Does writing code faster make infrastructure swap easier? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jasoneckert 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Several organizations in my area of Canada (including ours) have this as a directive right now too, and are actively exploring options for ensuring data is hosted in Canada or Europe (or have already begun or completed their migrations). |
| |
| ▲ | hununu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Being hosted in Canada is no longer the safety many assumed before. In reality it should not be an American company beholden to the current administration. | | |
| ▲ | throwaway2037 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And that has never happened to any European company, right? (I'm looking at you ASML.) By your logic, does that mean that most European nations are "no longer the safety many assumed before"? | | |
| ▲ | andruby 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The example you mention is a tricky one, ASML is about as European as it is American. It is heavily subject to US export controls because its machines include US components, US software and US IP. They operate multiple R&D centers and factories in the US and employ a lot of US employees (~20%) | | |
| ▲ | throwaway2037 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > The example you mention is a tricky one...
Let me generalise: Does your tech company use CPUs from Intel, AMD or Qualcomm, or NVidia GPUs or memory from SK Hynix, Samsung, or Micron, or harddrives/SSDs from Western Digital, Hitachi, IBM, Toshiba, etc., or motherboards from (any Taiwan manuf.)? Or anything produced by Samsung or TSMC? If yes (1000% of tech companies), then you are potentially subject to the magic wand of US sanctions and soverign interference. To be clear, do not read that last paragraph as a support of this soverign interference, only an acknowledgement of it.The first time I heard that the US was "requesting" (surely a gun-to-head moment) that the Dutch Gov't restrict ASML exports to China, personally, I was stunned. Sure, the Netherlands and US have incredibly strong political, economic, security, and historical bonds, but I never expected US to interfere so deep into the Netherlands. And yet, the Netherlands capitulated. (Please don't read this as a criticism of NL -- they are ultimately "Real Politik" due to their population size.) If NL can fall, then so can any other nation in Europe (or Northeast Asia: JP/KR/TW), except Belarus and Russia. | |
| ▲ | libertine 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Out of curiosity, couldn't ASML replace the all of those elements with either their own development or new suppliers? This is taking into account the worst case scenario, which isn't that unlikely to happen. I mean, for sure there are these plans in motion already, but how hard would it be? | | |
| ▲ | oneplane 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not really, some of the IP is core to the product and it cannot function without it. In theory if you do something like come up with a complete replacement for EUV, you could, but everyone with deep pockets has already been trying to do that without success. Same goes for the supply chains, most companies (including ASML) don't manufacture everything themselves; so components that come out of the US would need non-US suppliers, which don't always exist. I suppose it's a case of 'technically possible, realistically infeasible'. A more likely scenario might be either a from-scratch not-as-good machine that you can source locally (supply-chain wise) or a novel finding (which is hard to predict if it will happen and if so, when). | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not just ASML, when I working in EU at another major Dutch semiconductor company, the leadership and decision making was mostly US-based and centered around US policies, even if the HQ was still technically in the NL, but because PE and most other major investors were all US Bay Area. For example my manager had to reject a candidate from Iran, simply due to US policies, even if that wasn't against the EU policies, and would actually have been illegal discrimination in the EU where the position was opened, but this policy came from the US and was applied in an unwritten fashion in the EU. The influence of the US on finance and tech is massively understated. Plenty of international EU tech companies whose business model doesn't revolve around catering to the EU market and sovereignty, will tailor their products and operations to comply with US regulations since that's where a lot of their customer base and money is made. Just read the last post of the CEO of Bird, you can disagree with him that he's a scumbag and he's full of shit, but the truth is if you want your SaaS to make money, you gotta be in the US. That's why Mistral has a large presence in SV and London. Continental EU just sucks for acquiring capital. Even at the no-name Austrian startup I used to work before, the biggest investor was a US PE, since no German or Austrian investor wanted to invest more than 5 figures in the company, which was not enough to cover the payroll of the ML/data scientists. As long as the EU investors refuse to invest in domestic companies and their future, EU companies will forever be tied suckling to the US teat if they wish to grow and survive. | | |
| ▲ | throwaway2037 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > when I working in EU at another major Dutch semiconductor company
Ok, come on, please stop playing this silly HN game of: "another major ... company". There can only be four other options: NXP, SMM, BE Semi, Nexperia.Or a bit deeper: SMART Photonics, EFFECT Photonics, Nearfield, Prodrive Tech, Neways Elec. Which one? > As long as the EU investors refuse to invest in domestic companies and their future, EU companies will forever be tied suckling to the US teat if they wish to grow and survive.
Let me respond in the most offensive manner possible: Do you prefer the teat of US or China (or Russia!)? Pick your poison. | |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > but the truth is if you want your SaaS to make money, you gotta be in the US Worth specifying here you're talking about VC-infested SaaS, not just your run-of-the-mill bootstrapped SaaS. It's very much possible to run a SaaS in Europe and make money, as countless of people already do, which I'm sure you too are aware of, but probably way harder to raise similar amount of money as US companies, that I'd agree with. Edit: Strange typo; s/infested/invested, but kind of makes sense like that too so I'll just leave it, Freudian slip or something. | |
| ▲ | thrownthatway 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Out of curiosity, did the startup you used to work for survive? |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | cryo32 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Seeing and hearing the same. When our giant private equity owners are even pushing us down the on-prem route. I’m hearing it from “normal” people too which is actually quite weird. To the point of going back to paper for some stuff. |
| |
| ▲ | AllanSavageDev 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I spoke with some high level folks at a very profitable private company recently and inquired as to why they had DBAs on staff for what amounts to a pretty simple OLTP type system. Id naively assumed that someone of that scale would be using a cloud provider (RDS for AWS etc) thus negating the need for someone who really knows DB internals and upgrades and OS level stuff. The answer was that they simply didn't trust GCP or AWS or Azure to see their data and know how much silly money they were making in the niche industry they almost completely monopolize. I recently interviewed with a lower-case-m megacorp in a similar situation and they host on-prem for the same reason, at great expense and hassle in facilities all over the country. Seems like theres room in the market for some kind of an On Prem Private Cloud Stack that emulates GCP/AWS etc but locally maybe? Cloud-In-A-Box anyone? | | |
| ▲ | kilburn 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Seems like theres room in the market for some kind of an On Prem Private Cloud Stack that emulates GCP/AWS etc but locally maybe? It's more like cloud-in-a-rack, but that's what https://oxide.computer/ is trying to do isn't it? | |
| ▲ | cryo32 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | From our perspective I'm not sure the cloud abstraction is better or we even want it to be done like that locally. Look at S3 as an API for example. It's absolutely dire. I'd rather use NFS (!). And stuff like Lambda and Cloud Functions are just cat turds. On the DB side, I can't say too much as we're a pretty obviously identifiable AWS customer if I give out any details. I will only say that nothing fits our size and scale so we have to run on bare metal. That just makes it really fucking expensive colocation. | | |
| ▲ | AllanSavageDev 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Lambda is awesome .. until you actually try to use it for realsies. Cat turd is an apt description. Just being able to get the damn logs for debugging is itself a hassle. Terraform helps a ton in all this and I rarely find myself using the AWS UI anymore. Still Lambda is a great idea that just doesn't deliver for any use case more than responding to some S3 upload action or Event Bridge operation. Don't even get me started on the API Gateway sitting in front of a group of related Lambdas. Its OK once you get it setup and running but buildign/changing it amounts to stabbing yourself in the eyes. | | |
| ▲ | OhMeadhbh 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I saw you post "lambda is awesome" and was going to reply with "only in certain circumstances." But you beat me to it. After about a year of poking lambda to see how it actually worked (versus how it was documented) and building a cloud formation replacement (TF eventually did what I wanted, but not before I made a simple PROLOG based replacement for it). But I finally made it work after MUCH struggle. So... +1. I put this in our code several years ago: "WARNING: Do not look at Lambda stack with remaining eye." | |
| ▲ | meekins 4 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
| |
| ▲ | oneplane 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Those local options exist, and have been around forever, but the problem is nobody is doing it without cutting corners and with pay-as-you-go elasticity (and the 'call an API, get a VM instantly' effects that go with it). Most on-prem deployments were trash and a lot of them still are. Not because it couldn't be better but because it's easier to just have some random hypervisor department do this work manually and not do the work to create it as an internal product. Even VMware with vrealize failed and that's about as 'customisable cloud platform in a box' as COTS enterprise software can get. Maybe it's because IaC and APIs were just not in the vocabulary of the average system integrator or on-prem operating team (it's still lots of clickops and copy-paste). | |
| ▲ | branko_d 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sounds like HPE GreenLake. | |
| ▲ | j45 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You are likely describing software like Proxmox which has quietly been able to do so much for a long time. Open source, and works great when small, and at scale. https://www.proxmox.com/en/products/proxmox-virtual-environm... https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=introduction+to... |
| |
| ▲ | j45 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | On prem / self-hosted used to be the norm. The "cloud" rose to prominence from a small period of tiem where Amazon had a lot of extra cloud capacity outside of Black Friday, etc, and linux networking issues that needed architecture to be a certain way. Those linux networking issues have been long since solved, but the "cloud" was discovered to be incredibly profitable and sticky in the name of convenience and proliferated. A lot of the "cloud" software is open source software that was packaged to have a web and api front end, and that service renamed to something specific to AWS, etc. |
|
|
| ▲ | codethief 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yup, I've been seeing the same development pretty much everywhere. It's become a standard question in procurement processes in all EU-based organizations I've worked for (I'm a consultant). |
|
| ▲ | vanschelven an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The fact that these "move off US infra" posts now routinely hit #1 on HN is itself pretty telling. Another example is the public outcry here in the Netherlands over selling off the company doing the infra for an important citizen-facing piece of government software (DigiD)... |
|
| ▲ | leokennis an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's interesting the economic damage a few disgruntled WASP's in US swing states can do to the US economy by electing an orange toddler. |
|
| ▲ | chasd00 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| this is good, there's money to be saved in many many cases with self hosting. Cloud was supposed to save money but it's gotten so overdone that now companies have dedicated devops teams just like they use to have dedicated sysadmin teams. I think you can take the opensource paas's out there and selfhost something internal that covers 75-70% of your use case at a fraction of the cost of aws/gcp/azure. |
| |
| ▲ | flumpcakes an hour ago | parent [-] | | The price of hardware (DELL, HP), and the price of enterprise software (VMWare, Nutanix, etc.) has increased an insane amount in the last 12 months. In our case some of the services it has been as much as 6x. Hardware quotes are rising 10-20% per week. Delivery dates are months out. It has become so bad that we're considering moving to the cloud for our on-premise workloads. Only problem is some of the cloud providers in the areas we operate from have run out of compute. |
|
|
| ▲ | alibarber 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > (albeit over Teams) Would be great if this irony was taken note of at this level. |
|
| ▲ | j45 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Learning to self-host, or host on different platforms is critical. Designing startups from the beginning to be able to be hosted in different places will become a norm. |
|
| ▲ | MoaMoli 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| i mean it makes so much sense, cause of the political instability. I recently was at a reception (because of the europe day) and there I talked to some officials that told me that even they don't really know how to to tackle the problems of nowadays. Basically every european state is trying to move its IT infrastructure from the US to Europe and i read somewhere in the news that Aldi is supposed to provide infrastructure to compete with AWS... |
| |
|
| ▲ | eithed 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Loss of trust towards US is one factor; another is enshittification of services; yet another are good enough monopolies that EU don't have capital to disrupt |
| |
| ▲ | embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I'm willing to wager a bet the former reason is the bigger reason. Many of the data migrations I've helped with, been to services that owners know are slightly worse or doesn't have one feature they ideally should have had, but because of the first reason, it's more important to move now than to wait for it to be perfect. I don't think many are migrating because of "enshittification of services", I haven't heard that as a reason myself at least. |
|
|
| ▲ | unixhero 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| This is not a change. It has been asked since the advent of GDPR. So nearly 10 years. |
| |
| ▲ | sisve 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It started 10 years ago, but have def escalated the last year IMHO. Im sorry to say it, but i feel a lot of Europeans have lost a good deal of trust in the US. | | |
| ▲ | PaulKeeble 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The USA is threatening war with the the EU and its allies. A loss of trust doesn't quite convey the seriousness of relationship destruction this causes and the monumental shift that is now happening. | | |
| ▲ | kzrdude 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Leaders are not conveying so much about the loss of trust, because they are saving face for the US to try to rescue what little can be rescued of the remaining relationship. |
| |
| ▲ | pastage 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The complete disinterest in international allies from the American public is troublesome. I recently was in a discussion about what kind of responsibility we can put on the residents of the US for this situation. A US lawyer answered "well the 25th amendment ties our hands, and we do a lot of protesting so no blame on us". The judgement on US citizens was pretty harsh. You guys have to work a lot harder to fix your issues. | | |
| ▲ | coldpie 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > The complete disinterest in international allies from the American public is troublesome. I don't think that's a fair characterization of the American public. I am interested in America's standing in the world. More than half of Americans do not support these lunatics. Unfortunately due to our inherently unfair electoral system which gives preference to money and land over voters, it requires about 60~70% of Americans voting against them consistently for at least a decade to overcome the lunatics. That's just a very high bar to clear. > You guys have to work a lot harder to fix your issues. Open to suggestions. The only ideas I have for relinquishing control of the US from the billionaires back to the people would, rightly, get me banned from HN. | |
| ▲ | 2p3onf_Dfj an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There is a way in which this whole situation has been revealing to me about how little some outside the US actually understand about US politics and civic structures, or alternatively have their own form of isolationism. The heterogeneity in the US — culturally and in terms of political-legal structures — is far greater than those in Europe and Canada seem to understand sometimes. This is now combined with a corruption of democratic legal processes (e.g., gerrymandering) that make options outside of outright civil war a needle increasingly difficult to thread. There is a reason people are bringing up Hungary — it would be absurd to equate the EU with Hungary for the same reasons it's absurd to paint the entire US with a broad brush. Something like 90% of people in the US opposed what was going on with Greenland. Just about the only people in favor of it in the US were the presidential administration and people trying to curry favor with it. What do you expect the other 90% to do? The legislators being petitioned were busy with a deluge of other immediate domestic problems — maybe people outside the US didn't understand the scope of the unaccountable fascist police occupation going on in cities such as Chicago, Minneapolis, or Los Angeles? Protesters in Minneapolis were being murdered by these thugs. That's not even getting into the dismantling of social safety nets, rampant corruption, Venezuela, etc etc etc People outside the US do not want a US civil war. It's happened before and if it happened again would happen along the same geopolitical lines as before. It would be devastating not just to the US but to the rest of the world. Treating everyone in the US as the same, without recognizing the very real divisions involved, or the structural stresses involved, doesn't help anything. Everything happening in the US could happen everywhere. If you have enough politicians distorting and destroying traditional democratic mechanisms in favor of a criminal fascist and party domination, people have fewer and fewer options left outside of things that no one wants. "The complete disinterest in international allies" is a dishonest statement, and I can only assume reflects total ignorance of what is happening in the US, and/or a self-serving defense mechanism to avoid really confronting the difficulty of what those in the US are faced with. | | |
| ▲ | dlev_pika 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I don’t think the billionaire technofascists will just stop by their own volition, no matter how nice we ask. |
| |
| ▲ | drstewart 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So true. Now, what level of blame can we put on the EU for not supporting Ukraine more over the past few years, with all the vetoes from Hungary? | | | |
| ▲ | chasd00 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > You guys have to work a lot harder to fix your issues. As an American, that's pretty funny seeing how allies of the USA are constantly hostile toward Americans at every turn (unless we're buying a tshirt or something) and have been for many presidential administrations. Why would Americans be interested at all in what allies have to say when it's always negative anyway? When someone tells you you're their enemy long enough you begin to believe them. As for the discussion of moving tech stacks to Europe, if that's where your company is why did that not make obvious sense day 0? Why would you place your critical infrastructure in another country not beholden to your laws? If you're based in Europe then you should host in Europe, and even further, host in your country. | | |
| ▲ | GJim 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > that's pretty funny seeing how allies of the USA are constantly hostile toward Americans at every turn 457 British solders dead in Afghanistan supporting US operations beg to differ. Mate, seriously, step away from the propaganda and pay attention to what is happening to your democracy. Then you might understand why your allies are losing trust. | | |
| ▲ | TRiG_Ireland an hour ago | parent [-] | | It should be a matter of shame, not pride, to the British that they followed a jingoistic US into a needless war in Afghanistan which achieved nothing but much senseless death. | | |
| ▲ | GJim an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | It was. The 2003 protests against the war in Afghanistan were the biggest in UK history. Approximately 1 Million people (1 in 60 of the UK population) made their way to London to protest, and hundreds of thousands protested in other cities on the day. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_February_2003_Iraq_War_prot... | |
| ▲ | drnick1 22 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | What makes you say that wars are unnecessary? You don't get to see what would have happened in the absence of a war. Keeping some countries like Iran in check by restricting their arsenal, or weakening their economies and military capabilities seems absolutely necessary for world peace for example. |
|
| |
| ▲ | p_j_w an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Deciding not to join our little adventure in Iraq was not a hostile act. |
|
| |
| ▲ | chasd00 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | trust or not, US vs EU or somewhere else, you should be in charge of your data and your data should be subject to your laws and yours alone. It only makes sense. /lives in the US | | |
| ▲ | palata an hour ago | parent [-] | | Agreed, but that's not how it was because of trust. And now it's changing because of lack of trust. It often feels like US people never trusted the EU and now feel offended when EU people say "we don't trust the US anymore". I find that interesting. |
| |
| ▲ | rf15 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | We have gained a lot of confidence that having control ourselves is actually enormously valuable. | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As a European: yes definitely. And that won't be fixed if you choose a sane administration again. There can always be another Trump. It will take significant time to build trust again. | | |
| ▲ | chasd00 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It will take significant time to build trust again and nothing of value was lost. What did the US get out of the relationship? | | |
| ▲ | vga1 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | gestures confusingly towards all the American digital services used in EU I thought that was exactly what is being talked about here. |
| |
| ▲ | drstewart 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | An invasion threat isn't easily forgotten. Eventually things will be ok but America will have to prove itself again. Trust comes on foot and leaves on horseback. Even if Trump is replaced by a Democrat, the conditions that made Trump happen are still there. That won't change from one day to the next. And don't forget he already happened twice. 10-20 years of decent administrations will make things ok again. But of course our economies will be much more decoupled by then. That process has been set in motion now and won't easily stop. That can start going the other way again but things will have to meaningfully change then over time. As for Hungary I still don't trust them as far as I can throw them. I would have been happy to bump them back to candidate EU member during the Orban reign and let them prove themselves. Don't forget this Magyar guy is still super conservative. Just less anti EU. But unfortunately EU law didn't provide for the ability to throw a country out. That was a huge oversight. | | |
| ▲ | drstewart 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You are right of course. Germany eventually rebuilt trust within Europe, but now have a highly decoupled economy from their neighbors. As you correctly point out. | | |
| ▲ | lava_pidgeon an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | 1.) after ww 2 European economies were very decoupled
2.) One guy mentions Netherlands but if we can think about Poland, Israel, Ukraine. Israel and Ukraine because Germany supported these countries militarily, in Poland financially but still ww2 is not forgotten. Btw. You can ask Canadian people what they thought about their annexation threats. | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | No but it has been 80 years doh. When I was young there was still a lot of ill will and distrust against the Germans and that was 40+ years after the war. We were still joking about wanting our bikes back (the nazis stole everything metal at the end of the war to make weapons). And didn't like them at beach resorts etc. People would much rather buy American than German products. That's over now but it took a very long time. Which was exactly my point. Time and consistently good politics will heal this but time it will take. Of course the sooner you turn things around the better but the disconnection has already been set in motion and big ships turn slowly. |
|
| |
| ▲ | onemoresoop 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | EU wokeup from their sleep with backstabs all around. What a rude awakening indeed. Possibly some were dismissed when they raised this scenario as unlikely. | | |
| ▲ | drstewart 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There can always be another Orban. Unless Europeans can never trust Hungary again and move away from them at lightspeed, I'm smelling hypocrisy. | | |
| ▲ | wolvoleo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I didn't say never. I just said, if America gets a sane administration again, things won't be automatically back to normal. There will be caution for years. Also, any new administration will spend years undoing all the destruction that has been done until things can be considered normal again. And yes I don't trust Hungary. | | |
| ▲ | onemoresoop 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Trust needs to be earned again, it’s a long process but ultimately it can be gained back |
| |
| ▲ | onemoresoop 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Im sure there are other would be Orbans ready to jump in. In fact the current US admin is stoking the fire openly. |
|
| |
| ▲ | FpUser 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | >"So, what's the European thinking on Hungary as a partner within the EU in the future?" Does that really matter? They can not un-member it. And if current economic situation persists you will find more with the Orban like thinking. |
|
| |
| ▲ | vrganj 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The fact that you're being downvoted for this shows that Americans are not unaware, but actively in denial instead. |
| |
| ▲ | radicalbyte 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In some cases but not enough. Some of us has been doing a lot to help educate companies and business here and with the current administration - and the fact that they are being explicitly backed/funded by the Silicon Valley tech companies long resisted government overreach - have helped to finally open ears in boardrooms to the dangers of the Cloud Act and other leverage. | |
| ▲ | CalRobert 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | GDPR gave us "oh cool AWS has eu-west-1 and pretends to comply so we can also pretend to comply" but I think the tone has shifted to actually caring, at least a little bit. And with the CLOUD act all the US based hyperscalars can't really offer compliant hosting. | |
| ▲ | pjc50 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | GDPR is a bureaucratic annoyance. Trump is an existential threat. | | |
| ▲ | joe_mamba 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Trump is not the core issue since he isn't a hereditary monarchical dictator. It's the US population that's the problem, since they voted to put him into power TWICE, which means that they can also do it again, and again, and again, for other candidates not named Trump and not always Republican, but who could be even more unhinged, so we need to do everything to decouple from them so that their election decisions will impact us less. No offence guys, but you do bare the responsibility of your democratic choices, as do we. | | |
| ▲ | pjc50 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, neither was Orban, and he caused huge problems. The real enduring toxic legacy is the packing of SCOTUS, sold to voters as a means of overturning Roe V Wade but in fact a massive enabler for corruption and gerrymandering. Those guys are there until they die or Democrats grow a spine, probably the former. |
|
|
|