| ▲ | tamimio 6 hours ago |
| And soon desktop OSes will follow, if you don’t have TPM you won’t be able to browse half of the internet. |
|
| ▲ | roywiggins 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not soon, now. The new reCAPTCHA on desktop shows you a QR code for you to scan with your Google-approved phone to prove you have one. |
|
| ▲ | Andrex 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A parallel, fully public and accessible internet being widespread and available for anyone with a slight tinkering kick... Could actually be really awesome. Let the commerce-driven, corporatized hellhole that the modern web has become eat itself. |
| |
| ▲ | spencerflem 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I love the vision, but I do wonder how the parallel internet will deal with DDoS levels of bot traffic. I hear ‘web of trust’ pretty often and I like the idea but that’s not anonymous or accessible either | | |
| ▲ | donmcronald an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > I love the vision, but I do wonder how the parallel internet will deal with DDoS levels of bot traffic. Something that makes it expensive to initiate a connection and cheap (relatively) to accept or reject would probably help. I think that’s a hard problem though. | |
| ▲ | SV_BubbleTime 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well, how does Tor or other services do it now? | | |
| ▲ | spencerflem 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | They get blocked by Recaptcha, I think. I’m not talking about the network itself but the servers on the other end. I guess my point is that while Google is definitely malicious, I don’t think every site using recaptcha is and if we expect them not to use that tool there should probably be an alternative. | | |
| ▲ | 986aignan an hour ago | parent [-] | | > They get blocked by Recaptcha, I think. I think SV was asking what onion services, which can't really use recaptcha, do to prevent the DDoS storm. And I would imagine the answer is obscurity, since the dark web isn't nearly as well-mapped as the public web. That and some Anubis or other PoW would probably go far. | | |
| ▲ | SV_BubbleTime 19 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Proof of work I get, but isn’t that like step2? If I’m hosting at some IP, I still need Anubis or something to serve up the challenge, so doesn’t that become the attack point? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | chadgpt2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | anonymars 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What a coincidence that Windows 11 makes it a requirement! |
|
| ▲ | fsflover 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| TPMs can also be based on free software and our own keys. It works well with Heads and Librem Key. |
| |
| ▲ | cyklosarin 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | TPM with things like Heads are borderline zero security and theater compared to actually decent implementations on Android/iOS platforms, I doubt the big companies would rely on that. TPM in general on non Mac/Chromebook PCs is mediocre even from big OEMs. |
|