A parallel, fully public and accessible internet being widespread and available for anyone with a slight tinkering kick... Could actually be really awesome.

Let the commerce-driven, corporatized hellhole that the modern web has become eat itself.

▲

spencerflem 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I love the vision, but I do wonder how the parallel internet will deal with DDoS levels of bot traffic.

I hear ‘web of trust’ pretty often and I like the idea but that’s not anonymous or accessible either

▲

donmcronald an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> I love the vision, but I do wonder how the parallel internet will deal with DDoS levels of bot traffic.

Something that makes it expensive to initiate a connection and cheap (relatively) to accept or reject would probably help. I think that’s a hard problem though.

▲

SV_BubbleTime 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, how does Tor or other services do it now?

▲

spencerflem 2 hours ago | parent [-]

They get blocked by Recaptcha, I think.

I’m not talking about the network itself but the servers on the other end.

I guess my point is that while Google is definitely malicious, I don’t think every site using recaptcha is and if we expect them not to use that tool there should probably be an alternative.

▲

986aignan an hour ago | parent [-]

> They get blocked by Recaptcha, I think.

I think SV was asking what onion services, which can't really use recaptcha, do to prevent the DDoS storm.

And I would imagine the answer is obscurity, since the dark web isn't nearly as well-mapped as the public web. That and some Anubis or other PoW would probably go far.

	▲	SV_BubbleTime 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Proof of work I get, but isn’t that like step2? If I’m hosting at some IP, I still need Anubis or something to serve up the challenge, so doesn’t that become the attack point?

▲

chadgpt2 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]