Do you really believe no human is going to read your resume at some point in the process and notice the classic AI tells?

Further de-duplication is rather easy, and will likely see you black-listed by competant organisations.

▲

stingraycharles 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

“Do you really believe no human is going to read your resume at some point in the process and notice the classic AI tells?”

Even here on HN many people don’t recognize AI tells that are obvious. Pretty much 100% of all articles posted on HN have been AI generated for months and months already and people don’t seem to care.

I have very little faith in humanity being able to deal with the chaos that LLMs are going to unleash on society.

Heck, most resumes are probably skimmed at best already.

▲

cl0ckt0wer 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The only resumes that make it past the ai to a human are ai generated

▲

Esophagus4 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

When I’m hiring, a human recruiter (or the hiring manager) reads most resumes.

For us, there is some sorting by basic keyword analysis and we start near the top, but there is no proverbial black box that rejects candidates outright.

If candidates are ignored by humans, it’s not because AI rejected them, it’s because we are starting with candidates earlier in the list and might not make it to applicant 537.

▲

zipy124 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Rather unlikely to be the case, supported by the original article itself here, since if your statement was to be the case they would find that the human generated resume is 100% less likely to be shortlisted.

	▲	stingraycharles 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Obviously it’s not 100% of all human resumes are going to be filtered out, but it’s quite damning that human resumes are more likely to be filtered out just because they didn’t LLM-ify it.

▲

nottorp 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

In organizations where LLMs sort the resumes yes, I believe no human will read my resume until it's too late.