Remix.run Logo
djyde 4 hours ago

I've also noticed that when I communicate with Grok in my native language, its tone is more natural than other models. I think this is due to the advantage of being trained on a large amount of Twitter data. However, as Twitter contains more and more AI-generated content now, I'm afraid continued training will make it less natural.

adjejmxbdjdn 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The causation could also be the other way round.

Twitter language has started seeming normal casual to us, rather than us using normal casual language in Twitter.

pacific01 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Did you try meta? I was into grok but now meta works well for me

thunderbong 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm sure Twitter knows which are the bot accounts and is surely excluding them from their model training. Twitter bots aren't a new phenomenon after all.

cowsup 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think Twitter/X know for sure who the bots are, since Elon has been pretty vocal about trying to stop them for ages, yet I still get lots of spam DMs (as do others with far fewer followers/reach).

Even if 95% of the spam gets actively reported and dealt with, that still leaves a ton of nonsense on the platform, getting fed into the LLM. And spam has only gotten worse over the years, as the barrier to entry has lowered and lowered.

GTP an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Are the spam DMs advertisements or more generally something linked to a product or service? I wouldn't be surprised if X is more lenient towards bots that pay them for adverts.

HarHarVeryFunny an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd have guessed that at least some of the bots are Twitter itself, trying to draw you in with some sense of engagement. Given that Musk is the owner, and everything we know about him and have seen him do, I'd not be surprised if some of the MAGA bots are his too.

joncrane 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>Elon has been pretty vocal about trying to stop them for ages

You know people lie, right? Especially when the lie casts them in a better light and/or makes them more money.

subscribed an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Elon lied on record many times, admitting to the lies only when forced, under oath.

hackinthebochs 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Highly doubtful seeing as my 14 year old twitter account got caught in a recent bot ban wave with no means of contacting a human for recovery.

pixel_popping 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There is bots everywhere, it has nothing to do with the platform, it has to do with attackers having an incentive to do mass account farming, no platform is secure against it.

rglullis an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Super easy, just make a web-of-trust type of thing: messages are only visible to those who already vouched for you. Otherwise, you pay $0.01/per message/per user reached.

kedihacker 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

With banning and deboosting they need to be very accurate but with filtering they can be more liberal in excluding

simianwords 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

not really. there are easy heuristics to filter out bots with good confidence. FWIW i don't see any bots posting anything in my feed

pixel_popping 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes your individual feed isn't really relevant if we talk about the masses, Reddit accounts are for sale quite cheap, HN as well, X too and so-on, it's literally just a matter of means/methodology. If I want today to do 1000 random posts talking about a certain thing, I could.

simianwords 3 hours ago | parent [-]

my individual feed does matter because it shows that it is possible to curate something without bots which is obviously what XAI would do

darkerside 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sadly, it's more likely that people will just start talking like bots

pdimitar 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I've seen this expressed as a concern even from one of my colleagues. My retort was:

"English is not my native language and LLMs taught me quite a few very useful formalisms that do land well for people and they change their attitude towards you to be more respectful afterwards. It also showed me how to frame and reframe certain arguments. I agree sounding like an LLM is kind of sad but I am getting a lot of educational value -- and with time I'll sneak my own voice back in these newly learned idioms and ways to talk."

JKCalhoun 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You're absolutely right!

2 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
techjamie 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There was already evidence last year[1] that pointed to ChatGPT-specific words like "meticulous," "delve," etc becoming more frequently used than they were previously. The linked study used audio of academic talks and podcasts to determine this.

[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01754

pohl 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

Part of me wanted to object to those two examples, which I’ve used frequently since the reaching adulthood in the 80s. Another part of me has been triggered by an apparent uptick in the word “crisp”, which my gut takes as an coding-LLM tell.

nex-z an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]