| ▲ | Apple Says Mac Studio and Mac Mini Will Be in Short Supply for Months(macrumors.com) |
| 64 points by tosh 2 hours ago | 39 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | Auzy 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| The Mac Studio definitely shouldn't be. My M2 studio was the only computer I ever owned that had issues with the USBC ports not working with certain cables (and for the price, it should have had better performance). I've owned a M2 Mac Studio, PowerMac G5, Mac Pro. Every single one had flaws that you would consider inexcusable on PC Hardware priced half that amount. The PowerMac G5 had terrible video cards (the liquid cooled ones also had issues with leaks, but ignoring that). The Mac Pro also had terrible Video cards (they were PCI-X), but also Fully Buffered ECC ram (which cost substantially more than any other ram).. Apple still can't even manufacture a proper mouse (who the hell puts a USB C port at the bottom). It's ridiculous.. If Linux distro's had a way to integrate Android as a first class citizen (like IOS is in MacOS), it would greatly boost the number of apps available in ecosystem, and have a huge impact on MacOS I feel. Waydroid is good, but, it still is too clunky (I'd like to see something more like Wine for Android, where its native) |
|
| ▲ | bottlepalm an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The Neo as well, I just need a Mac to test with and finding one is ridiculous. Hackintoshes are hell to setup and run like crap. I tried https://www.macincloud.com/ and that was a waste of time. Someone take my money. |
| |
| ▲ | montebicyclelo an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Ever considered second hand slightly older gens? Even M1 is still great for many use cases. E.g. often corps are selling them on Ebay, in pretty good condition. | | |
| ▲ | morphle an hour ago | parent [-] | | Indeed, ton's of refurbished for $250-$300 | | |
| ▲ | bottlepalm an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yea it does look like 5 year old M1's are going for $300 on eBay, but man that's painful a 5 year old machine for that much when you could get a new Neo or Mini for $600, if only you could buy them. I probably should just get the M1, test and sell it back on eBay. Thanks. | | |
| ▲ | deaux 11 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If you're going to do any kind of work on it I'd choose a 5-year old 16 GB memory M1 over a Neo every single time. 8 GB is what's painful. The CPU difference is very small anyway. | |
| ▲ | brailsafe 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you literally just need to borrow one, I'd just buy an Air from Apple directly and then return it within the 14 day window. I'll sometimes do this if I need an extended repair on my personal one, or there's a new mac I want to try. | | | |
| ▲ | yreg 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Neo isn't much better than M1. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | scboffspring an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Not sure what happened to you with macincloud, but I used scaleway hosted Mac mini M1 a couple years ago for a self hosted CI server, and it was working very nicely. | | |
| ▲ | bottlepalm an hour ago | parent [-] | | They don't really advertise that you can install nothing on the machine. It's super restricted. | | |
| |
| ▲ | hurricanepootis an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I remember 4 years ago I was able to setup MacOS in a virtual machine. Maybe you can setup an Intel copy of MacOS on a qemu/kvm virtual machine? | | |
| ▲ | bottlepalm an hour ago | parent [-] | | I tried this, https://oneclick-macos-simple-kvm.notaperson535.is-a.dev/, it wasn't bad for 'one click install' and got the VM running, it was just unusably slow and burning up my machine. Seems like I need graphics acceleration in the VM which doesn't work on my Ryzen GPU - QEMU running on Windows, and I don't want to deal with dual booting. Literally would rather buy a Mac (if I could). |
| |
| ▲ | morphle an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you send me an email I might have a machine or MacOS VM on that machine you can use. | | | |
| ▲ | dyauspitr 20 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don’t even think you can do hackintoshes anymore post Apple silicon right? I remember having one about 10 years ago and it was absolutely fantastic and ran really well. Wish we could do that now so I wouldn’t have to develop apps on my M3 MacBook Air, which constantly runs out of memory and is a huge pain. |
|
|
| ▲ | wiradikusuma an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I guess the sudden demand is due to OpenClaw? But most people will still use cloud LLMs, right? Anything particular with the Mac Mini that non-Mac lack? |
| |
| ▲ | zarzavat 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Not just OpenClaw. The Mac mini is just stupidly good value for a desktop computer, and the RAM prices have only enhanced its appeal. Apple doesn't make much of a fuss about it but their chip performance is laughably ahead of the other chipmakers. The Mac Mini M4 gets a score of 3788 in Geekbench[0]. The top of the PC processor chart is 3395[1]. It's not even Apple's latest chip! PC processors can only keep up by adding more cores, but real world performance in many workloads is enhanced by having a smaller number of higher performance cores. [0]: https://browser.geekbench.com/mac-benchmarks [1]: https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks | |
| ▲ | ashdksnndck 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Mac mini has first-class access to iCloud, photos, iMessage etc. So if you are deep in the Apple ecosystem you might prefer it for that reason. I have a windows gaming desktop that I could use as a server for openclaw/cowork but I realized I simply don’t trust that system enough to give it access to all the personal stuff I’m giving to the AI. I trust Anthropic and Apple. I don’t trust whatever junk is running on my gaming desktop. If you want to run local models, another advantage is Apple’s unified memory architecture. The biggest Mac mini has 64gb ram and Mac Studio has up to 512gb. Compare this little box to what monster Nvidia gpu system you would have to buy to get the same memory there. That doesn’t account for the shortage of basic $600 Mac minis though. | |
| ▲ | operatingthetan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | An M4 mini is overkill just to run OpenClaw. I'm running it on a Pentium J5005 and it's running 20 other services in Docker. I think the main thing was many wanted it to be able to access iMessage. I think people dream of also using the mac to run the LLM but the 16gb ones don't have enough ram. | | | |
| ▲ | hparadiz an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You can look up benchmarks. It's different depending on the model of Mac Mini and Model of LLM. The take away is that some of the Apple hardware hits a sweet spot for performance and price which may change in the future but for now it's causing a lot of demand so people can run inference without GPUs. Also Macs keep a lot of their resale value so you can use them for a while and then sell them for sometimes 80% of their original value. | |
| ▲ | chillfox 29 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Affordable ram! I recently bought one for my k3s cluster, and it was the cheapest 16g ram I could get by a decent margin. | |
| ▲ | znpy an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | My understanding is that openclaw is only a factor, and a relatively minor one. Most likely the limiting factor is the crunch that chip companies are going through. |
|
|
| ▲ | ksec an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It is the SoC, not the memory as reported in the earning call. And lead time for SOC is 3-4 months. i.e even if they decided to increase order in March, if would be at least until July those volumes reaches warehouse ready to be shipped. And that is assuming there are spare capacity from TSMC for Apple to order, right now there is very little to none. What annoys me most isn't the Mac Studio and Mini. It is the Neo. Someone must have done a poor job in demand planing. ( As well as pricing ). Only 5M unit till the end of the year when they are now increasing it to 10M. And it will likely miss this education's year cycle in the summer. Hopefully they do better with A19 Pro Neo. Mac could reach up to 400M to 500M usage share. Roughly 25% of PC market. |
| |
| ▲ | akmarinov 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Historically whenever they’ve done lower price products - iPhone SE, the current E editions, etc - they’ve sold poorly, that’s what probably got them. The thing is that the Neo is actually useful. | |
| ▲ | touristtam 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Rightly deserved |
|
|
| ▲ | bajor an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| More fomo |
|
| ▲ | BerkeyMcBerkey an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Opps, our lack of foresight into AI tripped us up, again. |
| |
| ▲ | amelius 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is just a preview. At some point even the most economically liberal people will say that enough is enough. Making money and building capital is perfectly okay if you're working hard, but if you use said money or capital against the rest of us (who chose a different life) then we have a problem. |
|
|
| ▲ | _the_inflator an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Apple got so bad with its products, so bad indeed that they took a bet on the low price sector with the Neo and abandoned the powerhouses. It is so funny, because due to the high profit margin as a relative share of the price Apple earns more by selling a few top models than with dozens of Neos. Tim Cook, the supply chain master leaves house the moment the very reason why he got hired in the first place is in dire straits. I don’t think that the successor will likely change that, since Cook made sure, no one is remembering Jobs anymore and as top manager won’t pass a reversal of many of his decisions. So he will lead through a CEO he controls. Only if the new guy takes on the battle in the name of product there might be a chance but this would mean, Cook and the new CEO have to be dismissed. So popcorn times, I think Apple is going to stay as boring as it got, while the quality constantly declines. |
| |
| ▲ | dwedge an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | The Neo won't sell dozens of models they will take the low end laptop market by storm. I think your comment will age very poorly | | |
| ▲ | robertjpayne 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | This exactly. No other laptop comes close on price for the hardware you get. Yeah you may get more ram in a PC but promise you it won’t feel as fast when you’re using it day to day or have as good of a display or battery life. | |
| ▲ | stingraycharles 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | The Neo is already considered a huge success and is the reason for the scarcity. |
| |
| ▲ | swiftcoder an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > so bad indeed that they took a bet on the low price sector with the Neo and abandoned the powerhouses The Neo isn't just a bet on low prices - it's a machine that convinces people they can get away with less RAM. In the middle of a pricing crunch, why wouldn't you ship an 8GB machine like the Neo? Its a win-win, Apple gets to ship a brand new SKU in volume despite the RAM crunch, and they get to punch into a previously untouched market. | | |
| ▲ | lloeki 37 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I'm hoping that the success of the Neo and the RAM shortage makes people realise that 8GB should be enough for most tasks without constantly swapping. That 32GB or even 64GB is considered a minimum to be able to run some word processing, chat app, fetch remote content, and display funny cat photos is preposterous. In terms of information storage, these are absolutely immense numbers. The infinite treadmill
of chasing for more RAM and then immediately proceeding to carelessly fill all of it at the first line of code is part of a deeper, wasteful, and self-imposed obsolescence process. We don't need more RAM, we need more frugal software. |
|
|
