| ▲ | chuckadams 4 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ingress is frozen, not deprecated. Gateway does more, but Ingress isn’t going anywhere. It’s a stable API, which is the opposite of churn. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | physicsguy 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Til there's a security issue, right? Nginx is a big target. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SOLAR_FIELDS 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Would love to use Gateway! Every time I spin up a new cluster it goes like this: - New cluster setup, time to use gateway! Yay! - Oh crap, like 80% of the helm chart and other existing configurations I need for the softwares I'm trying to deploy STILL doesn't use gateway, this new API that's been out for... like half a decade at least. - Even core networking things like Istio/Envoy only have limited gateway support compared to ingress - Sigh. Ingress again. It's been like this since gateway's inception and every time I check the needle has moved like 2% towards gateway. So I'm looking forward to year 2050 when I can use gateway! The problem, as CNCF knows, if they pushed Gateway and deprecated ingress the world would revolt due to the amount of work involved to migrate stuff. Therefore, they leave it up to "the people" to do the extra work themselves, who have no incentive to do so since for many usecases it's not materially better. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||