| ▲ | SOLAR_FIELDS 4 hours ago |
| Cities who want to keep cars out of bike lanes should stop offering “mom says we have bike lanes at home” repainting of streets. Create a curb and raise the bike lanes. It’s the only safe solution. I understand this is not realistic in a lot of scenarios but it is basically the only way you can achieve actual safety short of cement separators at the road level, which is basically a curb anyway. There’s just no reality where a bicycle can share the road unimpeded with a motor vehicle safely. No, plastic bollards are not enough. It needs to be either raised or a barrier enough that a car sideswiping it won’t cause the barrier to fail |
|
| ▲ | bartwr 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| My experience cycling regularly in NYC: bike lanes separated by curb, stoppers, or poles are more dangerous as cars stop at their entrances/exits and I am literally trapped or cannot enter them before/after an intersection.
I'm not against them in principle, but without extremely strict enforcent of laws (let's say a ticket 5% of someone's annual income and a loss of DL on a repeated offense - this stuff endangers people's lives), they are sadly counterproductive. :( |
|
| ▲ | moomin an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People undoubtedly said this was not realistic in many car-clogged European cities before some actually did it. “Realism” here is just a measure of the current number of votes you have for making things better. |
| |
| ▲ | altairprime an hour ago | parent [-] | | It helps to replace ‘realistic’ with ‘palatable’, which at least conveys the issue more precisely as one of desirability rather than capability. Most U.S. voters for someone who interferes with drivers on behalf of non-drivers. |
|
|
| ▲ | WillAdams 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The thing which I think would really help with bike lanes would be to standardize on placing underground utilities beneath them --- they'd be less expensive to dig up than a roadway structured for cars, and when maintenance is necessary, a cyclist can easily be diverted either onto the roadway (if staying on the bike) or to the sidewalk (if temporarily dismounting). |
| |
| ▲ | monster_truck an hour ago | parent [-] | | The width of a bike lane and its margins is not nearly enough space to safely trench deep enough with the equipment they already have to reach most things they need to tear roads up for. Even modest water mains can be 4ft in diameter, drainage and sewage twice that (in flood prone areas) |
|
|
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | lxgr 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Bike lanes on a curb are significantly more dangerous due to turning car drivers often not seeing them (due to parked cars in the way) or interpreting them as “just a sidewalk” and not properly looking for cyclists. |
|
| ▲ | cosmotic 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've seen people park in these curbed bike lanes too, completely blocking it off. |
| |
| ▲ | Ekaros 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Seems like they need to fenced off. Would also prevent jaywalking so in general increase safety of pedestrians forcing them to cross only at intersections. | | |
| ▲ | bradleyjg 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Great, now how are we going to force bicyclists to open red lights and stop signs? |
| |
| ▲ | rolph 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | ive also seen cyclists having to squeeze by, and are forced to offer up against the side of the blocking vehicle to avoid being hit, leaving pinstripes bumper to bumper. |
|
|
| ▲ | mcmSEA 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Agree with this. The concrete barriers being added in Seattle help a lot. |
|
| ▲ | Shadowed_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Or they could fine them. And increase fine for each repetition so rich can't just pay to be jerks. |
| |
| ▲ | SOLAR_FIELDS 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | All the fines in the world won’t save you from getting mowed down by a distracted driver on their phone. Drinking and driving has heavy fine deterrents, yet people still do it anyway. You know what stops a drunk or distracted driver from killing someone? A cement barrier | | |
| ▲ | rolph 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | add to that, a class of drivers that believe two wheel vehicles have no place on public thoroughfares, openly hostile to non cars. | | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > a distracted driver on their phone Waymos don’t get distracted. Grade separation, ticketing and increasingly favoring AVs in cities is a simpler solution than erecting physical barriers, which have the downside of making cities less walkable. | | |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 an hour ago | parent [-] | | That would be relevant if we had mass adoption of autonomous vehicles. Unfortunately last I checked actual autonomy was still stuck in the perpetual R&D phase. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross an hour ago | parent [-] | | > last I checked actual autonomy was still stuck in the perpetual R&D phase I know plenty of people in Phoenix for whom it’s their main mode of transport. When I’m there or in San Francisco, it’s certainly mine. (And now, increasingly, in Miami, too.) Waymo is here and it’s real and it’s so much better than Uber or taxis. | | |
| ▲ | fc417fc802 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Sure, there's a very gradual, strictly limited, tightly controlled rollout. It's certainly not to the point where anyone would realistically design a city center around it. There's perhaps a small handful of companies globally that are currently prototyping the technology in a process that's shaping up to take a decade or longer to play out. Even once things reach that point reworking an existing place would be a massive undertaking. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > not to the point where anyone would realistically design a city center around it Sure. Neither is Phoenix's light-rail system, for the most part. These things take time to play out and gain buy-in. Americans take about 34 million public-transit trips a day [1]. Assuming 25 rides per day, that's about 1.4 million self-driving cars to rival public transport's impact. Waymo has "about 3,000 robotaxis deployed nationwide" [2]. Doubling fleet size annually–Waymos and non-Waymos, though currently they have no peers–would get us to parity in less than 10 years. (A more-realistic 35% growth rate puts us around 20 years.) The point of that excercise is to say that within 10 to 20 years, less time e.g. California's HSR or New York's Second Avenue Subway took to get online, we could see as many trips in AVs in America as we do on public transit of all types. That's close enough to start looking ahead to. [1] https://www.apta.com/news-research/about-the-industry/public... [2] https://www.axios.com/local/san-diego/2026/03/30/waymo-speed... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | doug_durham 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Bike lanes with curbs aren’t great. On garbage days trash cans often get parked in the bike lane and cyclists have no way of going around since the curb block their way. I’m perfectly comfortable with just lines for bike lanes. |
| |
| ▲ | lwansbrough 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You might be, but cycling adoption is strongly linked to safer riding conditions. Protected bike lanes are demonstrably safer. So perhaps you should be more concerned about people blocking roadways with their garbage? | |
| ▲ | SOLAR_FIELDS 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’ll take my chances with the trash can over the SUV that can’t even see me because it’s so lifted and that will kill me instantly if the driver isn’t paying attention. At least with the trash can I have a chance |
|
|
| ▲ | wffurr 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yes! Concrete please! |
|
| ▲ | trhway 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >There’s just no reality where a bicycle can share the road unimpeded with a motor vehicle safely. that was among the promises of self-driving cars. Because of ultimately superior sensor suite and reaction time they can be safer than humans, in particular they would never "not see a bicyclist", they wouldn't cut impatiently, etc. . Instead that superiority is used these days to drive more "efficiently", to beat/cut the human drivers in a way not every regular human would be capable of. At least that is my anecdotal observation during the last several months (and these several months experience totally differs from the more than 15 years of having Waymo cars around in MV when they were i'd say among the safest to be around) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46199294 From the more recent - saw again a Waymo cutting like a ninja into a left turn lane at the same intersection as before, and at the other intersection a Waymo car missing the point to get in line for the right turn behind several cars already waiting in line in the bike lane, drives forward on green and makes the right turn as the second layer of the cake in parallel with those cars from the bike lane. I think all that aggressiveness/"efficiency" comes as a result of the push to increase the customer satisfaction. All these years before driving actual passengers, Waymo (and i guess others) could allow themselves to be the safest, most courteous drivers on the road. Not anymore as such "inefficient" granma-style driving obviously would conflict with the passengers satisfaction. |
| |
| ▲ | SOLAR_FIELDS 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Maybe in 40 years or so everyone will use self driving vehicles that work perfectly and this will be a solved problem. We should probably do something about the problem in the meantime though |
|