Really neat. Out of curiosity, does this need to use the Github API? I hoped something like this could be done with plain http.

▲

v9v 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I use https://github.com/TxGVNN/github-explorer for this and even though it doesn't have a C-x C-f nicety (you just m-x github-explorer then type in the repo name) it works via http (or at least I don't recall giving it any API key or anything).

▲

iLemming 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Of course it needs to use the API. How are you otherwise read the private repos?

▲

necovek 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Authenticated HTTP or even SSH should allow it, especially if you are restricting to GH and know how their web URLs translate into git repo URLs.

	▲	iLemming 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Ah, okay. I get now what the question meant. Sorry, it's past midnight here and my brain is ketchup. Git's own protocols let you talk to a remote repo without cloning it, so why not use that, right? Multiple reasons: - Tree listing. There's no raw HTTP URL that gives you a directory listing. raw.githubblabla.com can't do directory indexes. You'd have to shell out to git ls-tree ... etc over the ssh, which means essentially implementing a partial git client. - Getting subtries is also problematic - Branch listing and repo search - no git protocol equivalent for those - need the API - Current approach fetches the entire tree in one API call. Doing the same over pack protocol means negotiating a fetch, receiving packfile data and parsing it. Much heavier, much more code. We can only imagine a world where git's transport layer gives you a browsable filesystem interface. It doesn't - git's protocols are optimized for syncing object graphs, not random-access file browsing.