| ▲ | dotcoma 16 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It works very well for the HUGE players who sell it, Google, Meta, Amazon and not many more. It can help a small advertiser get a small number of customers to try out their offering. It does not and will not create brands. If you disagree, please tell me about brands created by “Internet advertising” in the current century. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | zetanor 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising isn't just B2C, it's also B2B. The companies that make everything you buy (from the food you eat to the electrical wires you install in your walls) needs raw materials and machinery to produce anything. While there's trade shows and good ol' fashioned handshakes and whatnot, one of the main ways to sell B2B is just camp the top Google result spots by giving Google a lot of money to be the first result for the names of business inputs (or the names of your competitors, if you want to be cheeky). When you hire a non-technical purchaser, when production line 13's full-body discombobulator breaks and the maintenance guy says "we need a new full-body discombobulator", the purchaser has no idea what a "full-body discombobulator" is or who makes it but they'll Google "full-body discombobulator" and they'll click [Buy Now] on whatever link shows up so that production line 13 can continue printing half a million bucks an hour. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | satvikpendem 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gymshark, Warby Parker, Casper, Liquid Death, Olipop. Many 21st century consumer brands have been built by internet advertising. Seems like you do, based on your comment about your book, but in general I feel like many people who say stuff like the comment above don't actually work in marketing or startups, particularly non-tech physical goods based ones, or have even run their own ads on these platforms. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | compounding_it 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The goal of advertising is to hammer you with the same content again and again until your brain associates something with the product. Like shampoo associated with what you see everyday in the advertisement. However in order to do this, whether you are selling or buying, you have to have the scale. And the scale of big players is now too big to compete. And even if you do, your infrastructure will run on any of these big companies who can do anything to your traffic to keep their business and later pay fines for unethical practices that are minor compared to the profits. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hackthemack 15 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That is sort of the inferred conclusion of the podcast, it is a bit of a racket by the big players. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | marcosdumay 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ground News? Anyway, Google, Meta and Amazon don't sell the king of ads that make brands. But there exist branding ads on the internet. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||