| ▲ | Youth Suicides Declined After Creation of National Hotline(nytimes.com) |
| 189 points by marojejian 7 hours ago | 78 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | umpalumpaaa 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| A while ago I was seriously sick + in a hospital (for a few months). The doctors told me that I won't be able to resume my regular job (software engineer). At the same time I was in a lot of pain – unable to sit, walk, stand. It was not really clear how it all would end. I got deeply depressed and just wanted to die. The pain was just too much - even with controlled pain medication in a hospital setup. I called the German crisis hotline almost every night and they were usually very very helpful. They listened - sometimes for 1-2 hours. In 90% of my calls I felt way better after calling them. They really are well trained and some of the personalities I talked to were pretty impressive and interesting… They have seen a lot… |
| |
| ▲ | Frieren 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I hope that you feel better now. And I am very happy that you got help. Mental help is never a cost for society, it is an investment. | |
| ▲ | keybored 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’m glad that it helped and that it worked for such a seemingly somatic issue. I wouldn’t have thought that. | | |
| ▲ | washadjeffmad 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That's understandable. I went through a period of chronic pain and, had it continued, I likely wouldn't be alive today. The mechanisms protecting us from non-existence by millions of years of evolution can be eroded by pain. It's not something you realize you even have to lose until you've experienced it firsthand. I certainly never expected it, and it's hard for me to imagine what I'd intended while going through it. | |
| ▲ | jodacola 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I just listened to a fascinating podcast episode of Armchair Expert on pain psychology that went into such topics [0]. May not be some folks’ cup of tea, but I was sucked in and want to study more. [0] https://armchairexpertpod.com/pods/rachel-zoffness |
|
|
|
| ▲ | marojejian 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| gift link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/22/science/988-youth-suicide... I bet there is so much more we could do to reduce suicides, which are a massively big problem. I wish we paid as much attention to suicide as we do to very rare mass shootings, which kill a tiny fraction of the people. |
| |
| ▲ | bombcar 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's important to remember that the majority of gun deaths are suicides. It's also important to remember that any blocker between a potential suicide victim and the weapon of choice reduces rates greatly. A gun locked in a safe where the potential suicide knows the code - reduces rates. | | |
| ▲ | throw0101d 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > It's also important to remember that any blocker between a potential suicide victim and the weapon of choice reduces rates greatly. A gun locked in a safe where the potential suicide knows the code - reduces rates. RAND found that minimum age requirements and child-access prevention laws reduced suicides and unintentional injuries/deaths and violent crime: * https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/child-acce... * https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/minimum-ag... * https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy.html | |
| ▲ | rolph 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/data.html the data from CDC agrees with you, and agrees that a firearm is most common method. but also indicates age correlate with freq of suicde by firearm. guess who the least frequent group is, kids. now that might fly in the face of stats, but suicide is an "intentional" thing.
[that rides on the idea that you are competent to form intent when suicidal] so yes if you keep your guns secure, and gun proof your kids to mitigate accidents that should improve things, for kids. however take at least as much care for your grandparents, they are apparently at extreme risk, of forming intent and, acting especially grandpa. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The point of the second part is that grandpa locking up his gun reduces his risk of suicide. Anything that adds a "checkpoint" that activates even some small other part of the brain seems to help. | | |
| ▲ | rolph 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | yeah you got it, the reasons why it seems to be the better choice are somewhat glum. terminal illness with no quick relief in sight, an estate now the best contribution to be made vs impending medical expenses. it might work for spur of the moment almost reflex decisions, but its a different story when the choice is made over a few years, reinforced by physical reasons. |
| |
| ▲ | hirvi74 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > however take at least as much care for your grandparents, they are apparently at extreme risk, of forming intent and, acting especially grandpa. What if allowing suicide is taking care of one's grandparents? After all, if I was diagnosed with a awful condition like Alzheimer's, ALS, etc.. I am absolutely going out that way once I start having more bad days than good days. | | |
| ▲ | dlev_pika 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s why we have laws protecting end of life rights in Oregon - which are much preferred over millions of firearms in the hands of ‘rEsPoNsIbLe gun oWnErS’, impulsive and impaired decision making, and someone walking into a traumatic mess coming back home. | | |
| ▲ | mystraline 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Most of the rest of states use hospice as a way to kill people with morphine. Basically they give the patient as much as they want, and usually stops their heart. Naturally, medically assisted suicide is illegal in most states. But its wink wink nudge nudge "pain management". | | |
| ▲ | dlev_pika an hour ago | parent [-] | | I hear you - as usual, people will do what they need to do in the way they can. Personally, I wish we collectively recognized that this ‘pain management’ is a disservice to all dealing with those situations, much like handing out medical marihuana cards to recreational users was for actual patients, or women addressing family planning issues in some less than acceptable settings. Alas… |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | skylerwiernik 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Interesting. What causes this? Could it have to do with the type of person to keep a gun in a safe (has kids, is more cautious in general, etc) or have studies shown that this minor friction is actually enough? | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Suicide tends to be impulsive. Any friction, even brief, can give an opportunity to think twice. | | |
| ▲ | bombcar 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | That was the general conclusion as I recall it. Originally it was thought to be "someone else has the key" kind of things - which of course, does limit it - but even controlling for "I have to walk downstairs and find the key" reduces it. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Barrin92 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | the Israeli military did a study about ~15 years ago where they looked at soldier suicide rates after they had enacted a policy of leaving the weapons at base over the weekend and if I recall correctly it cut the rate of suicides by 40-50%. | | |
| ▲ | alistairSH 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | And on the flip side, the US Sec Def recently allowed US soldiers to carry loaded weapons on base (when not in a role that required it, which was previously disallowed). I expect this will increase suicides on US military bases. All for some "rah rah, 2A, mah rights!!!" bullshit political posturing. | | |
| ▲ | lamasery 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That policy has long been a kinda funny "gee, why don't they allow it if more 'good guys with guns' make us safer?" example. I guess at least this removes that bit of rhetorical inconsistency... at, guaranteed, a notable cost in lives. |
| |
| ▲ | ajb 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The US Veteran's Affairs agency makes a free app to help with insomnia; it has all the usual advice that would apply to anyone - plus advising veterans not to keep a loaded gun by the bed, even if it makes them feel safer going to sleep. | |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I bet that has as much to do with where and when alcohol is consumed as it does guns. |
|
| |
| ▲ | GuinansEyebrows 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | this is a really weird comparison to make given that the US has basically made no material progress on policy that could prevent mass shootings. they're both really really bad things. they both deserve as much attention as we can afford (which is more than they get). not to just jump down your throat -- i agree with you about more needing to be done to prevent suicides though. i think it's a good thing that hotlines are available but it's clear that putting the onus on people who are considering suicide to reach out for help is not enough. we gotta get better at reaching out and checking on our friends, loved ones, coworkers etc and help them carry the load more than we're culturally accustomed to. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > the US has basically made no material progress on policy that could prevent mass shootings Mass shootings vary significantly state to state, in part —I think—due to different gun and mental health laws [1]. [1] https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/mass-shooting-rat... | |
| ▲ | fhn 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | in your opinion, what policy should be made because whatever policy you make won't do much as long as guns exist? | | |
| ▲ | array_key_first an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Policy still matters even if guns exist. After all, murder is still illegal even though murderers exist. Building a bomb is still illegal even though bombs exist. The tricky part with the US is the already vast supply of firearms circulating. Can't do much about that. But, I would think, stopping or reducing the sale of guns right now would still have an effect. We already somewhat regularly try to reduce the sale of guns via policy, mostly to people we think are potentially dangerous. But, I don't know exactly how much that has helped, or will help. What I do know is there is definitely variance in gun violence. Both across nations, but also across states in the US. So, something is behind it. | |
| ▲ | GuinansEyebrows 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | are you asking me, a numbskull with an associate's degree, to propose public policy*? i think we're allowed to want qualified people to do better in the positions we've elected them to :) * if so, my policy is that all guns be vaporized overnight. also, my policy would include the end of lobbying entirely, including but not limited to the small arms industry and the NRA along with police guilds and other organizations supporting the small arms race in this country |
|
| |
| ▲ | mystraline 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So yeah, why not? Choosing to end thyself IS the penultimate "my body, my choice". We have immediate "no money, lost job, destitute" (insert temporary issue). And we have chronic, everpresent, or terminal problem. We could fix the first one, but socially we choose not to. Either way, we should have the right of bodily autonomy. I guess the american answer is, for a suicide help call, show up with pigs with guns, and shoot them for disorderly conduct? | | |
| ▲ | alistairSH 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The phrase "suicide by cop" didn't create itself out of thin air. | | |
| ▲ | mystraline 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, thats usually relegated by someone who wants to die but is too scared to do it. So they find people who legally can, usually by waving an empty gun around. But what I'm seeing is 60% of the people here in the USA are not functionally sustainable economically wise. And that is completely a fixable problem. But given how corrupted our government is, its likely not going to be fixed in the reasonable future (say, 20y). Live in poverty, no medical, no vacation, scraping by every day on what amounts of hope? I can understand why people want out. HN people are in a massive bubble. Most of us are fine. Average folks? Nope. Rural? Nope. Inner city? Nope. Homeless? Obviously not. Underage LGBTQ people with hateful/christian families? One of the highest suicide rates. Sure, I would absolutely rather help people through what seems to be insurmountable problems. Most of them aren't. But seriously, this country doesnt give a fuck. I'm pretty sure this country only cares about suicide at all is because it reduces lifetime tax revenue (for, primarily blowing up brown and middle eastern people). Thankfully, 1FA is still in the USA, mostly. So sites like https://sanctionedsuicide.site, even if theyre indexed to hell and back by Google and Bing. Id rather help people get past why they think suicide is the answer. But I also understand why someone is just tired and done. |
|
| |
| ▲ | dfxm12 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It doesn't have to be a competition, and similar things, like making it harder to get a gun, introducing/enforcing laws around locking up your weapon, making mental healthcare more available (including a hotline), etc., will greatly reduce both. | |
| ▲ | hirvi74 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I bet there is so much more we could do to reduce suicides I am absolutely certain that is the case, however, society operates with such demands from individuals that a majority of necessary changes would be adamantly fought against by those which stand to benefit from the suffering. Having been through the whole mental health treatment gamut in the USA, I am convinced the only goal of the system is to patch people up just enough that they can be churned back into the capitalist machine. What makes things even sicker, is that one's health insurance is often tied to their employment, so in order to receive basically any treatment, one is typically required to be employed and working. |
|
|
| ▲ | nyanmatt 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I don’t see how. Have you ever tried calling one of these lines in a suicide emergency? Things I’ve learned in California: - an ambulance will not be dispatched unless you physically witness someone trying to kill themselves - otherwise, they send the police - the police arrive without training and severely escalate the situation - the person having an emergency will be taken into custody and stripped of rights until being medically evaluated (not arrested) This is the program of an allegedly progressive state. After 2 experiences like this, adding trauma to already traumatic situations, I would never recommend these hotlines. |
| |
| ▲ | daheza 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Very much disagree and I am in California. I have called this line in particular during a sever major depression episode.
I tried calling my fraternities mental wellness hotline first but it went unanswered which I thought was quite funny at the time. The rep was able to talk me down through my spiraling thoughts. Told me that "no your therapist was not egging you on when he said well why don't you commit suicide what's holding you back". He was instead trying to figure out my reasons for living. They do not automatically call the police and telling people they do is harmful. My anecdotal evidence has been a much better experience, and others I know who have called have said the same. I'm not sure what would cause them to send the police but having a safe line to call when you have nothing else is important. Maybe the change that should happen here is having social workers or other mental health representatives respond, not getting rid of the phoneline. | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I have a loved one who used the 988 hotline several times. None of them resulted in police intervention. Our county has a mobile crisis team of social workers who show up and get you connected to services. | | |
| ▲ | spwa4 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | ... services that use force against individuals. Never ever, ever tell a social worker of any kind that you think of suicide, or that anyone else does. ESPECIALLY not if you're young. Help, or social worker's kind of help, does not help. And getting rid of social workers ... I almost killed one before that happened. All the lip service they make to that force is not the answer. It's lies, cheats and deception on their part, nothing more. Once on a forced youth services vacation I locked, with an entire group, a social services worker into a room. She became instantly educated why locking the rooms was a bad idea, why not even having a lock on the inside was an incredible mistake, and why youth workers ignoring screaming in the facility was an incredibly bad idea. All these people want is to be the big man (yes, including the 19 year old women who join), and you cannot explain it to them. After she eventually got out, we never saw her again, and the others were a LOT more flexible. And that wasn't even close to the worst that happened. These things is what social services calls "protection". They purposefully create situations where Gandhi would eventually beat up his own mother, and call it protection. Don't do this to people. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Consider the possibility that both your experience and those you worked with are not universal. The experience our family had was night and day different from yours. I suspect this varies enormously from country to country, state to state, county to county, and per provider. edit: OP changed their post substantially, and I'm now not quite sure what it's asserting at all. | | |
| ▲ | spwa4 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don't claim they are. And even if my experience is a 1% case, you still need to make people aware they're a possibility. And it's far more than 1%. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You didn't say possibility, though. You said things like "Never ever, ever" and "It's lies, cheats and deception on their part, nothing more". I have no doubt that forcible confinement is unfun. I also have no doubt that it's sometimes warranted and the best thing for someone to be able to heal. That you once menaced a social worker into quitting is not, I think, evidence against that. | | |
| ▲ | spwa4 an hour ago | parent [-] | | The social worker in question forced confinement on children, when I was one, and got to experience her own tactics firsthand. Her reaction to her own tactics was indeed to quit the job entirely, the second she got loose. Of course, the same courtesy was NOT afforded to the children there. They got locked up, yelled and screamed for hours, then were simply locked up again. There was no exit, other than violence. Which, of course, led to extreme violence and constant escalation. These assholes and idiots that call themselves social workers themselves can't themselves deal with the tactics they use on children. In fact they can't deal with 1% of the intensity of the tactics they use on children, because I assure you not having an exit for weeks after a few hours screaming out your lungs in a small room really 10x the stress. Then, 5 minutes later, seeing one kid using a knife on another, again just to get out of there, ANOTHER good way to 10x the stress. As for "the best thing for someone to be able to heal", you mean forcing kids into an environment with constant violence? Both among kids, a bunch of adults using violence against kids, occasionally extreme violence from kids against those adults, and violence from the situation/facility itself? (or how else would you describe confinement?) That's some social workers' way to deal with psychic vulnerability, and the potential consequence of asking for help with your vulnerability as a child, or, as in my case, a teacher "getting help" for a vulnerable child. Is that "the best thing for someone to be able to heal"? It certainly didn't prevent suicide or suicidal thoughts, and had the complete opposite of the "intended" effect when it was used on drug addicts, and anorexic patients. (oh and extreme violence WAS the way out. Once these social workers really did totally lose control, they'd "solve" the problem by sending the kid home. In fact, some they literally shoved onto the sidewalk. And of course, the second advantage of going out that way was that you would never be "asked" to return) | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz an hour ago | parent [-] | | > The social worker in question forced confinement on children… Sure. Because they needed it. (And there are a lot of social workers at much lower acuities than forensic psych wards for violent kids.) Kids don't like getting vaccinations, either, but stabbing the pediatrician in revenge is clearly not the solution to that. The pediatrician doesn't need a polio booster. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | nkingsy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If you want an ambulance dial 911. These hotlines are for providing support. They are trained not to escalate to sending someone unless they absolutely deem it necessary (and the caller agrees). My wife has been working the hotline as a volunteer for 6 years and has not once escalated to sending someone. As others noted, my California county has a dedicated team to respond to this. | |
| ▲ | uyzstvqs 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Well that's just not true. You're supposed to call 911 if you witness someone else in crisis, not the crisis hotline. The police will be sent because they have baseline training in de-escalation, and they have officers with specialized training in crisis negotiation. An ambulance is relevant only if someone is already hurt. They're medical professionals. Even in that situation, police officers are usually dispatched to investigate and to keep the ambulance personnel safe in a potentially unpredictable environment. And you're correct, protective custody exists and it's there to keep the person in crisis safe. | | |
| ▲ | NoMoreNicksLeft an hour ago | parent [-] | | >The police will be sent because they have baseline training in de-escalation There are something like 30,000+ police agencies across the United States, and a proportional number within California (if we're talking about that place in particular and not more generally). To say "they have baseline training in de-escalation" is, at best, wishful thinking. While no doubt some departments make that a part of their training and within those departments most patrol officers will have undergone the training (enough that your statement wouldn't be especially incorrect if you were to specify one of those departments), it is beyond fallacious to assume that this holds true for all of them in general. Even when the training does exist and the officer has completed it, it consists of a one or two day seminar. They are not evaluated in a way that some pass and some fail. We do not know who took it seriously, and who thought it was some jackass bleeding-heart bullshit that they could ignore. We do not know if those anyone gains by it... if some are good at it afterward and others are bad at de-escalation afterward, has that percentage shifted upwards compared to whatever their pre-training scores would suggest? I do not believe you when you fallaciously assert "they have baseline training". No one else should believe you either, if the answer actually matters to them. I do not know why you assert this, and the speculation ranges from "not a good reason" to "even worse reasons". |
| |
| ▲ | wakamoleguy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And yet the data shows that they did decline. I'm sure they could be much better, and the response will vary from state to state. | |
| ▲ | hirvi74 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I find something darkly depressing and comedic about how we try to prevent people from shooting themselves by sending people with guns to help them. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > how we try to prevent people from shooting themselves by sending people with guns to help them People with guns are still people. Having anyone there will reduce harm in more cases than it escalates. Suicide is usually an impulse a lonely person who is otherwise perfectly sane carries out in the absence of intervention. | | |
| ▲ | ryandrake 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Replace the phrase "people with guns" with "institutional violence" because that's what the police are. When police are called to the scene, the intention of the caller is violence, not to help. If the intention was help, then actual helpers would be called instead. | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > the intention of the caller is violence, not to help This is mostly nonsense. Most cases where wellness checks result in a tragic outcome did not stem from the caller having violent intentions. > If the intention was help, then actual helpers would be called instead I believe clinician-led wellness checks are more effective than police-led ones [1]. But it’s untrue that police-led interventions are unhelpful. Not every person or community has a healthcare contact who will personally conduct a check. If the choice is between no check and a cop, you’ll save lives with the latter. [1] https://www.proquest.com/openview/5504a2f3d69ee782daddda0ce1... | | |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | >This is mostly nonsense. Most cases where wellness checks result in a tragic outcome did not stem from the caller having violent intentions. No, it's not. What's the point of the police? They bark orders that are backed by violence. The caller doesn't "mean" to add violence to a situation in the same way my racist grandma doesn't "mean" to be racist simply through her choice of vocabulary. This is completely tangential to suicide by cop. Even if the cops themselves smart enough not to escalate straight to a shootout they will apply increasing violence until you comply or die. It's literally their job. The degree to which police led interventions are helpful is mostly a reflection of officers and departments understanding that they need to behave like EMTs on those calls rather than cops and the people who they are being called on being compliant. |
|
| |
| ▲ | keybored 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Armed cops actively escalating the situation will help someone suicidal? The cops in my country do work that is not about catching criminals, like leading search and rescure operations. Apparently not a problem. Apparently now these particular police have started carrying weapons as a matter of course. So that’s a bad development for a regular, peaceful presence. But overall we seem okay with the regime. So I don’t have some personal feeling that violence is about to erupt because the police are nearby. But I don’t see how this helps for those particular locales where the population (or segments of it) only associate active police involvement with escalation. | |
| ▲ | hirvi74 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > People with guns are still people No one is questioning that police are people. > Having anyone there will reduce harm in more cases than it escalates That was never the point I was arguing against. I was arguing against which people are there. > Suicide is usually an impulse a lonely person who is otherwise perfectly sane carries out in the absence of intervention. I do not believe that in the slightest. There is an array of causes from physical illnesses, mental illnesses, spiritual beliefs, political beliefs, to even cultural beliefs. Sure, loneliness can contribute in some cases, but it does not hold a candle to conditions like mood disorders, psychotic disorders, substance abuse, etc.. |
|
| |
| ▲ | fontain 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | They're crisis services, not emergency services. Anyone who is an immediate danger to themselves or others needs to be attended to by the first available emergency services. The attending services should be trained to deescalate, definitely, but I don't think this is an indictment of the crisis lines themselves. Less than 1% of calls to the crisis line result in any sort of emergency service dispatch. | |
| ▲ | themafia 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A fact I've noticed is that suicide rates are higher in areas with lower population density. For example, Alaska's suicide rate is 4x what New York's rate is. Perhaps just human connection, even momentarily, is enough to break the pattern of behavior that has lead to the ideation. Also worth noting that suicide rates among the elderly are higher than they are for anyone other than teens. If you have someone you love that doesn't get out much, make sure you give them a call now and again. | | |
| ▲ | pibaker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The more likely explanation is guns. Gun ownership tends to be higher in rural areas because of a mixture of culture, politics, utility and laws. Only 14% of adults in New York State have guns compared to 59% in Alaska. Having a quick, easy and painless way to end your life right on your nightstand makes it a lot more likely that a bolt of suicidal urges turn into action. https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/gun-ownership.html | |
| ▲ | euleriancon 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | An alternative explanation is that cold places with long winters are depressing, and because they are depressing fewer people want to live there. Alaskan winters are hard regardless of how many friends you have. | | |
| ▲ | themafia 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you take a chart of population density, and overlay the chart of suicide rate, you'll see an exceedingly strong correlation. It does not follow weather patterns. Utah has 3x the problem relative to California, for example. | | |
| ▲ | jeffbee 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah if you go to CDC WISQARS you can do fatal injury reports filtered by intent (suicide) and aggregated by urban/non urban geography. These differences are not small, they vary by factors or orders of magnitude in every state. It's not the weather. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | declan_roberts 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| One sad fact I learned about adolescent suicide (12 to 18 years of age) is that it's seasonal. It picks up during the school year and drops precipitously during summer and winter vacations. Being in school has a profound impact on whether or not a child wants to kill themselves. http://basilhalperin.com/essays/school-and-teen-suicide.html |
| |
| ▲ | tombert 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I wasn't suicidal when I was in high school, but I absolutely understand people's depression around the school year. I actually don't hate school as much as an adult, but I really did view school like a prison when I was a teenager. I didn't like homework, I didn't like most of my teachers, I liked learning but due to the fact that schools have to go at a pace slow enough for the dumbest person they want to pass, I would get very bored during class, and so high school in general was existentially dreadful every day. Even when I got home, I would dread the fact that in about ~15 hours, I would have to go back to school again. It didn't help that there was a dread with grades in general; I wasn't abused or anything, and I think my parents in general were pretty ok at parenting, but as report card season came nearer and nearer, I would get more and more depressed, because when I would inevitably get middling-to-bad grades, I would get a lecture and/or grounded by my parents. This meant no computer, no games, I wasn't allowed to hang out with my friends, and they hoped that it would force me to study more. It's not dumb logic, but it just didn't work. I would just be sad and angry and still wouldn't do the homework. No doubt a large chunk of this was just hormonal, but I really think that the typical American school system is not a good fit for a lot of people, myself included. I don't think anyone has ever seriously called me stupid, but I would be in camp that endlessly frustrated teachers: I would do well on the tests, I would do well on the AP exams, no one disputed that I understood the course material well enough, but I just didn't care enough to do the homework so they would be forced to give me bad grades. I don't blame the teachers for this at all, they're just doing their jobs. Despite being in AP classes and having skipped two grades in math, I was seriously considering dropping out of high school and just trying for the GED so I wouldn't have to go anymore, and I probably would have done that if I didn't think that my parents would freak out. I didn't want to kill myself, but very few things brought me more joy in my life than knowing I wouldn't ever have to go back to high school again. I know a lot of people say that these are the best times of their lives, and power to them for that, but they were decidedly not for me. | |
| ▲ | keybored 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Adults put teenagers together and some of them get miserable. The adults’ response: oh lament the teenage woes, what is to be done. We are just adults with all the power on our side. I get the feeling that modern Western society and institutions are woefully maladjusted for those particular years. Those teenage moodswings are somewhat like upvoting/downvoting on HN. |
|
|
| ▲ | nxobject 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's good to celebrate this... but, looking forward, it's worrying to think whether kiddos these days are going first to ChatGPT instead, of, well, the hotline (or real people!) I think there's genuine value in going to an AI -- as long as you think of it as "interactive journaling", and not a human relationship. But, will they encourage struggling kiddos to make the leap and ask for support from an actual person? |
| |
| ▲ | inetknght 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > will they encourage struggling kiddos to make the leap and ask for support from an actual person? Where's the profit in that? | |
| ▲ | malfist 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I think there's genuine value in going to an AI What's it going to do, help them avoid passive voice in their suicide note? Encourage them to carry it out? Hype them up about suicide? Tell them they're absolutely correct? | | |
| ▲ | nxobject 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Honestly? As a veteran journaler who’s struggled with depression, I’ve always wanted an “organize everything that I splurted out today while I was overwhelmed” feature. I guess the question is: can we encourage kids to use AI to help organize their thoughts and reflections, while avoiding just looking for cheap affirmation? I dunno - we’re not prepared to teach AI literacy at that level. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ed_balls 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Something I read recently really stuck with me: giving people methylphenidate or other stimulants may lower the risk of a second suicide attempt by around 25%. |
|
| ▲ | ceejayoz 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| About a year ago: https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/trump-shuts-down-lg... > The Trump administration on Thursday afternoon officially terminated the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline’s LGBTQ Youth Specialized Services program, which gave callers under age 25 the option to speak with LGBTQ-trained counselors. As with the USAID cuts, this killed people. |
| |
|
| ▲ | renewiltord 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| All I know is that if I call this, they're going to wellness-check me and that's going to end with a hail of bullets from the police. There's exactly zero chance I call this line. I'd rather have people say "Oh, it's so sad" than "Why didn't he just comply?" after I'm dead, though the preference is weak considering nothing after I die really matters about me specifically. |
| |
| ▲ | ceejayoz an hour ago | parent [-] | | > All I know is that if I call this, they're going to wellness-check me... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/will-988-call-the-police-data-s... "Many people in mental health crisis fear that if they dial 988, law enforcement might show up or they might be forced to go to the hospital. But getting sent that kind of 'involuntary emergency rescue' happens to around 1% of callers, suggests new data from Vibrant Emotional Health, the administrator of the 988 Lifeline for suicide and mental health crises." | | |
| ▲ | renewiltord an hour ago | parent [-] | | Nah he’s bullshitting. It’s 1% of calls, not callers. If you’re in the 1% you’re not making another call. If you’re in the 99% you get to call again tomorrow. Listen, if you want to check your wellness be my guest. I won’t be. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | shevy-java 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Personally I never called any such hotline; my assumption
was that suicidal thoughts originate from one's own brain
and way of thinking - adjust that and these issues would
go away. Unfortunately, while this can work (for me it
worked extremely well, though I should also say, I don't
have suicidal thoughts to begin with, even more so as one's
lifespan is finite anyway - but I do understand those who
have a terminal illness, to not have to go through more
suffering when something is uncurable), there are people
for whom it can not work, often in the way how their
brain works. Just like some people have seizures, brains
are different too. It puts some responsibility on those who receive such
calls, because the caller may be in a state where any
additional negative input could push that caller over
the edge, due to their current state of mind. So this
kind of requires more training even of casual people,
just as people are expected to know the basic steps
necessary for first aid (on a fresh accident site,
for instance). It seems pretty clear that those on
the national hotline, must have had professional
training too. So if there is a decline of suicides,
this is most likely - and logically - due to the work
by those who take up the phones. |
| |
| ▲ | Jtsummers 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This is a fantastically ridiculously comment. > my assumption was that suicidal thoughts originate from one's own brain and way of thinking - adjust that and these issues would go away. Unfortunately, while this can work (for me it worked extremely well, though I should also say, I don't have suicidal thoughts to begin with You're, in this comment and the part I quoted, saying that adjusting your thinking worked well for you (with the implication that it worked well in dealing with suicidal thoughts), but you say you don't have the problem (suicidal thoughts or ideation) under discussion. This is like saying, "I've heard that you can walk it off when you break your leg, and that's worked for me, but I've never actually had a broken leg." Complete nonsense. | | |
| ▲ | nomel 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > but you say you don't have the problem I think it's very clear stated that they HAD the problem, but were able to work through it, resulting them in not HAVING the problem. So, it's more like they broke their leg, it healed, and now they no longer have a broken leg. edit: I am dumb. | | |
| ▲ | Jtsummers 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I think it's very clear stated that they HAD the problem, but were able to work through it, resulting them in not HAVING the problem. From their comment: >> though I should also say, I don't have suicidal thoughts to begin with How, from that, can you possibly get to the idea that they ever had suicidal thoughts? It's certainly not "clear stated" that they had the problem of suicidal thoughts. The comment I responded to is a nonsense comment. They say they solved the problem of suicidal thoughts by adapting the way they think and also say that they never had suicidal thoughts to begin with. It is possible that they're just a terrible communicator, but, again, nothing is "clear stated" about them having had suicidal thoughts. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | Forgeties79 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | This is bootstraps by another name. “Just (don’t) do it” belongs in nike commercials, not in discussions surrounding behavioral health. If it were that simple then we wouldn’t have these issues at this scale in the first place. Nancy Reagan “just say no” comes to mind. |
|