[flagged]

> Its not anywhere close

Close to what, and how are you measuring?

> nobody in the USA would be spending 7 figures on infrastructure for it

Au contraire, if AI had a moat it would pay for itself. They're funneling capital into infrastructure because they know it can't.

	▲	fragmede 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You need the infrastructure to train and run it regardless though. Kimi is great but I'm not getting the same performance from it running it on my MacBook or a 3090 as it running on a H100 or a Grace Hopper supercomputer. Pretend you did have said moat. Why wouldn't you also books infrastructure to run it on?
	▲	jstummbillig 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		What?