| ▲ | otabdeveloper4 7 hours ago | |
> Its not anywhere close Close to what, and how are you measuring? > nobody in the USA would be spending 7 figures on infrastructure for it Au contraire, if AI had a moat it would pay for itself. They're funneling capital into infrastructure because they know it can't. | ||
| ▲ | fragmede 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
You need the infrastructure to train and run it regardless though. Kimi is great but I'm not getting the same performance from it running it on my MacBook or a 3090 as it running on a H100 or a Grace Hopper supercomputer. Pretend you did have said moat. Why wouldn't you also books infrastructure to run it on? | ||
| ▲ | jstummbillig 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
What? | ||