Remix.run Logo
nine_k 4 hours ago

What we call "magenta" is the sensation of both red and blue color-sensitive cells in the eye being excited at the same time. There's no single wavelength that produces this effect (unlike e.g. yellow). The closes you can get is violet, which looks faint to the eye.

A rainbow gives you both red and blue; mute everything else, and you'll get magenta. That's what magenta pigments do when illuminated by white light (which is a rainbow scrambled).

dnnddidiej 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

It never clicked before that yellow and magenta are snowflakes to each other in this regard. I thought they were equals, but magenta is more majestic!

dyauspitr 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Saying a wavelength doesn’t do it doesn’t make any sense. If you can perceive it visually, a wavelength is doing it.

nine_k 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Two wavelengths do it; one does not suffice. It's like a perfect fifth can not one note.

dyauspitr 3 hours ago | parent [-]

The interference is a wavelength too. Maybe not pure but it is one. Afaik they cannot be interpreted as two separate wavelengths and then “brain combined” when the aperture (the retina) is so small.

dnnddidiej 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I haven't heard of a wavelength of 2 frequencies merged. It is like saying what is the wavelength if you tune to 2 radio stations with 2 radios (assume silent transmition for simplicity). There are 2 wavelengths.

redsocksfan45 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

redsocksfan45 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]