| ▲ | dyauspitr 3 hours ago |
| Saying a wavelength doesn’t do it doesn’t make any sense. If you can perceive it visually, a wavelength is doing it. |
|
| ▲ | nine_k 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Two wavelengths do it; one does not suffice. It's like a perfect fifth can not one note. |
| |
| ▲ | dyauspitr 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The interference is a wavelength too. Maybe not pure but it is one. Afaik they cannot be interpreted as two separate wavelengths and then “brain combined” when the aperture (the retina) is so small. | | |
| ▲ | dnnddidiej an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I haven't heard of a wavelength of 2 frequencies merged. It is like saying what is the wavelength if you tune to 2 radio stations with 2 radios (assume silent transmition for simplicity). There are 2 wavelengths. | |
| ▲ | redsocksfan45 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | redsocksfan45 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| [dead] |